SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (86835)6/30/2010 11:58:08 AM
From: TideGlider  Respond to of 224724
 
Election 2010: Louisiana Senate
Louisiana Senate: Vitter (R) 53%, Melancon (D) 35%
Tuesday, June 29, 2010 Email to a Friend ShareThis.Advertisement

Louisiana’s race for the U.S. Senate looks largely the same way it has since the beginning of the year, with incumbent Republican David Vitter continuing to earn over 50% of the vote in a state with unusually high Tea Party membership.

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in Louisiana finds Vitter, who is seeking a second six-year term, with 53% support. His Democratic challenger, Congressman Charlie Melancon, picks up 35% of the vote. Three percent (3%) like some other candidate, and nine percent (9%) are undecided.

In April, Vitter posted a similar lead over Melancon.

Since January, Vitter’s support has never fallen below the 50% mark considered critical for incumbents, ranging instead from 52% to 57%. Melancon, by contrast, has been unable to break out of the 30s, with his support holding in the 33% to 36% range.

The Republican leads by nearly 30 points among male voters and by a more modest 11 points among women. He holds a three-to-one lead among voters not affiliated with either major party.

Vitter has accused Melancon of supporting President Obama’s six-month moratorium on deepwater drilling following the disastrous oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico. In a state highly dependent on the oil industry, voters strongly support both offshore and deepwater drilling despite the environmental catastrophe that is already washing oil onto Louisiana shores. Melancon has denied the accusation, part of a continuing effort by Vitter to link the Democrat to the president who is unpopular in the state.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.

The survey of 500 Likely Voters in Louisiana was conducted on June 24, 2010 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 4.5 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

Melancon is one of the few Democrats in Congress who voted against the national health care bill which remains highly unpopular in Louisiana. Sixty-seven percent (67%) of the state’s voters favor repeal of that bill, well above voter sentiments nationally. Just 28% oppose repeal. This includes 58% who Strongly Favor repeal of the bill, and 16% who are Strongly Opposed.

Seventy-six percent (76%) of those who Strongly Favor repeal support Vitter, while 72% of those in the much smaller group who are Strongly Opposed back Melancon.

Fifty-nine percent (59%) of Louisiana voters favor passage of an immigration law like Arizona’s in their state, slightly higher than the view nationally. Twenty-four percent (24%) oppose such a law in Louisiana, and 17% more are not sure.

Vitter gets 71% of the vote from those who favor an Arizona-like law. Seventy-four percent (74%) opposed to a law like that in the state support Melancon.

Three-out-of-four Louisiana voters (76%) support one of the chief provisions of the Arizona law, requiring a local police officer to check the immigration status of anyone stopped for a traffic violation or some other kind of violation if he suspects that person is an illegal immigrant.

Thirty-one percent (31%) of voters in the state consider themselves members of the Tea Party movement, nearly twice the level of membership found nationally. Fifty-one percent (51%) say they are not members, but 18% more are not sure.

Eighty-three percent (83%) of Tea Party members and 61% of those who are not sure support Vitter. Fifty-four percent (54%) of non-members favor Melancon.

Fifty-two percent (52%) of Louisiana voters say the Tea Party movement is good for the country. Just 23% think it’s a bad thing.

This helps explain why only 40% approve of the job Obama is doing as president, unchanged from April, while 58% disapprove. This is well below his job approval ratings nationally as measured by the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll.

Twenty-six percent (26%) of the state’s voters hold a Very Favorable opinion of Vitter, while 14% view him Very Unfavorably.

Melancon, a member of Congress since 2005, is viewed Very Favorably by 20% and Very Unfavorably by 17%.

At this point in a campaign, Rasmussen Reports considers the number of people with a strong opinion more significant than the total favorable/unfavorable numbers.

In 2008, Rasmussen Reports projected nationally that Obama would defeat John McCain by a 52% to 46% margin. Obama won 53% to 46%. Four years earlier, Rasmussen Reports projected the vote totals for both George W. Bush and John Kerry within half-a-percentage-point.

In Louisiana, Rasmussen Reports polled on two races during the 2008 campaign. In the race for president, Rasmussen polling showed John McCain beating Barak Obama by a 57% to 41% margin. The final election results found McCain beating Obama 59% to 40%.

In the 2008 Senate race in Lousiana, Mary Landrieu defeated John Kennedy 52% to 46%. The final Rasmussen Reports poll before the election showed Landrieu winning 53% to 43%.

See all Rasmussen Reports 2008 state results for president, Senate and governor.

Rasmussen Reports has recently surveyed Senate races in Arizona, Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Utah, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (86835)6/30/2010 1:05:20 PM
From: SGJ1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224724
 
Read the statement again. It doesn't say he has to prove anything. That's your add.
The truth is that he hasn't, whether he has to or not.