SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ManyMoose who wrote (371039)6/30/2010 7:07:01 PM
From: alanrs2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794221
 
I would be less prone to point out an eating disorder and the subsequent costs to society if it weren't for previous conversations about other sorts of disorders and those costs. I find it curious that food addiction gets a pass. Although to some extent it might very well be germane in that addiction of any sort does imply some sort of psychological imbalance (some might even say moral failing). Not sure that SCOTUS (for life)is a good place for someone with an obvious mental illness.

ARS



To: ManyMoose who wrote (371039)6/30/2010 7:32:41 PM
From: alanrs  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 794221
 
"Kagan's ideas don't cut the mustard.

Sarah's do."

I agree entirely with this, but Kagan will hold high office and Pallin will not. So either you and I have very bad judgment or there is something unsettlingly strange going on.

ARS


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News