SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (79066)7/4/2010 12:14:53 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 149317
 
BP clean-up leaves U.S. vulnerable to another spill

Sat Jul 3, 2010 4:02am IST
By Joshua Schneyer

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The Obama administration may succeed in pushing through its offshore drilling ban, despite fierce resistance from the oil industry, since a piece of machinery in short supply has left oil companies and the environment glaringly vulnerable to another oil spill.

The offshore skimming devices -- seagoing vessels that suck up spilled crude -- are the first line of defense in the contingency plans that big oil companies are required to submit when they drill in the deep waters of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico.

But the vast majority of skimming capacity listed in "worst case scenario" plans to combat major Gulf spills is already deployed to clean up BP's leak, according to copies of the plans made public by Congress and lists of vessels active in the cleanup that were obtained by Reuters.

With few skimmers in reserve, any new spill could be harder to fight, including one caused by a hurricane during the Atlantic storm season that forecasters say could be one of the most intense on record.


That may give U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar the justification he needs to quickly issue a new deepwater drilling ban after a district court struck a first one down.

"We are working hard to issue a new moratorium in the coming days," Interior Department spokeswoman Kendra Barkoff said, without offering further details.

BP, Exxon Mobil Corp. and Shell Oil Co, among the biggest operators in the Gulf, would rely largely on the same armada of skimmers, according to contingency plans that were released by lawmakers investigating the BP blow-out.

Many of those vessels are among the 58 largest skimmers already cleaning up the biggest Gulf spill ever, one that has forced the closure of more than 80,000 square miles of fishing area and put the future of U.S. offshore drilling in doubt.

For instance, 84 percent of the skimming capacity Shell lists in its Eastern Gulf "worst case scenario" spill contingency plan is engaged in the BP effort, according to an equipment manifest given to Reuters. Two big spill response firms told Reuters that over 90 percent of their resources are already at work on BP's spill.

The bulk of skimmers listed in oil companies' contingency plans are controlled by a single spill response firm, Virginia-based Marine Spill Response Corp. (MSRC), formed and funded collectively by big oil companies after Alaska's Valdez Spill in 1989 and run by a former BP executive.


With BP's blow-out still gushing up to 60,000 barrels per day, the Gulf clean-up effort may drag on for months or years, even if BP can plug its blown-out well in August as planned.

Following the Valdez spill, offshore skimming vessels remained in action for more than a year.

"If you don't have the equipment to respond to a spill, you can't be allowed to drill," said Dan Lawn, a former oil safety inspector for Alaska's Department of Environmental

Conservation.

"The contingency plans should be revoked because they are worthless right now."

The U.S. Coast Guard, charged with overseeing offshore spill response, did not respond to requests for comment.

U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman of New Orleans last month struck down the Obama administration's first moratorium issued in May -- which halted drilling in waters deeper than 500 feet for six months. Feldman ruled it "arbitrary and capricious."

While any ban is controversial since U.S. Gulf oil projects account for a third of the country's oil production and thousands of jobs, Salazar pledged to press ahead regardless.

Grilled on Wednesday by a Congressman who said a ban would bring irreparable harm to Louisiana's offshore industry, Salazar said: "The greater irreparable harm would be if there was another blowout, when there is not the oil response capability to even deal with the current Horizon event."

FEW SKIMMERS IN RESERVE

More than 7,000 U.S. Gulf-based spill response vessels -- including skimming units -- and around 50,000 people are involved in the Horizon cleanup, the largest and most complex spill response ever. The vessels have recovered more than 28 million gallons of oil-water mixture so far.

The deployment of skimmers at BP's spill has expanded more than five fold since early June, and 550 skimmers were at work as of Friday, according to a release from spill responders. They expected 750 skimmers in action by August.


In preparation for offshore disasters, scores of skimming vessels are usually kept at staging areas in the Gulf Coast, but few are idle now.

BP's Gulf contingency plans call for racing skimmers to a Gulf spill in as little as 6.5 hours.

A contingency plan for Shell, the No. 2 Gulf producer, shows it could race 24 skimmers with capacity to suck up 162,752 of oil per day to a potential blow-out. At least 16 of the skimmers, and all of the largest ones, are engaged. Those that may still be available could collect less than 25,818 barrels, the vessel lists showed.

Shell declined comment on its Gulf contingency plans.

A person close to the company said Shell's contingency plan for the Gulf envisages an unlikely scenario with multiple spills. There is a "considerable amount" of safety equipment available still available, the person said, and Shell would still rely on a Gulf-based fleet of skimmers.

In addition, Shell could quickly import more boom, dispersant and other safety gear from Europe, the person said.

To be sure, skimmers are no silver bullet. They often collect less than 20 percent of oil that reaches the sea surface, experts say. But used with barges, tugs, absorbent booms and dispersants, skimmers play a major part in keeping oil from fouling beaches, especially if they are deployed fast.

Some support is already arriving from abroad.

One Taiwanese vessel that arrived this week, the so-called A Whale, is a converted supertanker with capacity to process up to 500,000 barrels per day of oil and water mix. It may gain Coast Guard approval to operate this weekend.

But the bulk of the world's offshore skimmers are on standby for spill responses elsewhere. Only 15 foreign response vessels were at work on the Gulf spill last week.

And even the A Whale is unlikely to free up other U.S. skimmers from their ongoing work, since an aggressive spill response requires up to hundreds of agile skimmers to cover the rapidly-expanding area of oil slicks, experts say.

BP's spill is no longer a single slick but a "massive collection of smaller patches of oil," response commanders wrote on Friday.

STORM RISK

Hurricanes bring more risk for oil companies in the Gulf, often requiring the deployment of skimmers after they pass.

In 2005, Katrina ravaged the region, laying waste to several drilling platforms and causing spills of at least 6.5 million gallons, more than half of the Valdez spill volume.

After the Valdez disaster, MSRC deployed seven of its largest, 'responder-class' skimmers during the 2005 storm season.

Today, 12 of the firm's 15 responder-class vessels are dedicated to BP's spill, MSRC spokeswoman Judith Roos said. The firm also operates dozens of smaller skimmers.

"Should another event occur, the Coast Guard has the authority to determine where to direct our resources," Roos said.

Shell, BP and Exxon Mobil's contingency plans all call for relying heavily on MSRC skimmers.

Employees at National Response Corp. and Ampol, the two other response firms listed in all three companies' Gulf response plans, told Reuters they have deployed more than 90 percent of the equipment they had available in the Gulf.

(Reporting by Joshua Schneyer; editing by Alden Bentley and David Gregorio)

in.reuters.com



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (79066)7/4/2010 12:15:11 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 149317
 
I love it!



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (79066)7/6/2010 12:58:51 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Recovery effort falls vastly short of BP's promises

By Kimberly Kindy
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, July 6, 2010; A01

In the 77 days since oil from the ruptured Deepwater Horizon began to gush into the Gulf of Mexico, BP has skimmed or burned about 60 percent of the amount it promised regulators it could remove in a single day.

The disparity between what BP promised in its March 24 filing with federal regulators and the amount of oil recovered since the April 20 explosion underscores what some officials and environmental groups call a misleading numbers game that has led to widespread confusion about the extent of the spill and the progress of the recovery.

"It's clear they overreached," said John F. Young Jr., council chairman in Louisiana's Jefferson Parish. "I think the federal government should have at the very least picked up a phone and started asking some questions and challenged them about the accuracy of that number and tested the veracity of that claim."

In a March report that was not questioned by federal officials, BP said it had the capacity to skim and remove 491,721 barrels of oil each day in the event of a major spill.

As of Monday, with about 2 million barrels released into the gulf, the skimming operations that were touted as key to preventing environmental disaster have averaged less than 900 barrels a day.

Skimming has captured only 67,143 barrels, and BP has relied on burning to remove 238,095 barrels. Most of the oil recovered -- about 632,410 barrels -- was captured directly at the site of the leaking well.

BP officials declined to comment on the validity of early skimming projections, stressing instead the company's commitment to building relief wells intended to shut down the still-gushing well.

"The numbers are what they are," said BP spokesman Toby Odone. "At some point, we will look back and say why the numbers ended up this way. That's for the future. Right now, we are doing all we can to capture and collect the oil through various methods. We will make sure all the oil is ultimately dealt with."

BP began downgrading expectations only two days after the rig explosion. Although its projections reported to the federal government were only weeks old, the company cited a greatly reduced number in a news release filed with the federal Securities and Exchange Commission. It projected that it had "skimming capacity of more than 171,000 barrels per day, with more available if needed."

The release presented an optimistic picture of a company scrambling to clean up the mess, mobilizing a "flotilla of vessels and resources that includes: significant mechanical recovery capacity."

In truth, the skimming effort was hampered from the start by numerous factors, including the slow response of emergency workers, inadequate supplies and equipment, untrained cleanup crews and inclement weather. Greatly compounding the problem was the nature of the spill, with much of the oil never surfacing.

The poor results of the skimming operations have led to a desperate search for solutions. The world's largest skimmer, owned by the Taiwanese, is on site and undergoing Coast Guard safety tests. The 10-story-high ship, which is the length of three football fields, was touted as having the ability to remove oil at the rate of tens of thousands of barrels every day. Thus far, it has been unable to produce those results in the gulf.

BP's March response plan was filed with the federal Minerals Management Service, which has oversight over oil drilling. BP said it would reach the stated goal largely by deploying two companies that have the necessary expertise, trained staff and equipment: the nonprofit Marine Spill Response Corp. and the for-profit National Response Corp.

But Marine Spill Response said it was never asked whether it could hit the optimistic marks set by BP. National Response declined to comment.

"Not at any time were we consulted with what was in the plan either by MMS or by our customer," said Marine Spill Response spokeswoman Judith Roos.

Daily reports from the federal government and BP's Joint Operations Center in Louisiana quickly showed that retrieval efforts were falling far short of promises. After the first week, just 100 barrels of oil had been skimmed from the gulf, while the broken well continued to pour as much as 200,000 barrels of oil into the water.

It wasn't until mid-June that BP's daily report noted the collection of 485,714 barrels -- roughly the amount it said it could retrieve in a day. But the June figure was for an oil-water mixture, which is about 90 percent ocean water.

Meanwhile, BP also kept revising its estimate of the amount of oil leaking into the gulf. In the early days after the spill, BP and federal officials placed the daily flow rate from the ruptured rig at 1,000 barrels a day, and then raised it to 5,000 barrels a day. In late May, a group of scientists charged by the government with estimating the flow said the rate was 12,000 to 25,000 barrels a day. And in June, the official estimated rate jumped to 35,000 to 60,000 barrels a day.

Because of these changing numbers and wide ranges, the amount of uncollected oil might be as low as 1.1 million barrels or as high as 4 million barrels.

Earthjustice, which has joined with the Sierra Club and other environmental groups to sue the federal government over BP's response plan, warns that because these estimates continue to climb, the spillage numbers could go higher.

Earthjustice also says spill damage is being obscured by misleading numbers.

On Monday, the joint operations center for the federal government and BP reported that more than 671,428 barrels of an oil-water mixture have been captured and stored.

The figures clearly have confused journalists, with many media outlets reporting the figures as solid oil recovery numbers.

About 90 percent of the mixture is water, so the true amount of oil skimmed is relatively small -- roughly 67,143 barrels of oil. Had the estimated amounts in the March response plan been accurate, 38 million barrels of oil could have been removed by now.

"This has been a cat-and-mouse game since March when they put out these estimates," said Earthjustice attorney Colin H. Adams. "We want real figures instead of inflated estimates on what they are cleaning up and deflated estimates on how much is gushing out."

In response to criticism that the government did not challenge crucial aspects of BP's recovery plans, the Coast Guard this week is scheduled to announce creation of an expert panel to conduct a "preparedness review" for Deepwater Horizon.

"I think this will fundamentally change the lay of the land when it comes to oil spill preparations," said Greg Pollock, deputy commissioner of the Oil Spill Prevention and Response Program at the Texas General Land Office. "Unfortunately, it's taken a catastrophic spill to get us to look at it."

In a statement, the U.S. Coast Guard and the Minerals Management Service (recently renamed the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement) said they are reviewing how cleanup estimates are crafted and the government's role in reviewing them.

"Without question, we must raise the bar for offshore oil and gas operations, hold them to the highest safety standards," the statement said.