SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (7639)11/7/1997 12:37:00 PM
From: CalculatedRisk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13949
 
Jeff, I had lunch with the Director of IT for a Fortune 500 company on Tuesday. We discussed a number of topics, but I couldn't help bringing up Y2K <G>. (He is being offered the CIO position at another Fortune 500 Company and wanted my advice)

To summarize: His company is in great shape. They are mostly replacing their legacy systems. For the remaining legacy systems, they have a well defined project to fix the Y2K bug that is taking about 5% of their IT budget through next year (similar to NB). The project is on track, uses in-house programmers, and will be completed by the end of 1998.

I told him about the incredible valuations of Y2K companies. His comment was: "Those investors must think I am stupid!" I have known this young man for 25 years - he is very capable and definitely not stupid.

But his comment opened my eyes! Really it comes down to this: I believe the people responsible for resolving this problem will succeed. Investors in Y2K believe these people are stupid.

Regards, Bill



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (7639)11/7/1997 3:34:00 PM
From: JDN  Respond to of 13949
 
Dear Jeff: Well, if you are correct, it will certainly help with mine. (gg) JDN