SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (87140)7/6/2010 9:05:06 PM
From: lorne  Respond to of 224748
 
A Majority of U.S. Combat Casualties in Nine-Year-Long Afghanistan War Have Occurred in Less Than Year-and-a-Half of Obama Presidency
Friday, July 02, 2010
By Edwin Mora
cnsnews.com

(CNSNews.com) – A majority of all combat-related U.S. casualties in the nine-year-long war in Afghanistan have occurred since President Barack Obama was inaugurated a little more than 17 months ago.

Between Jan. 20, 2009 and July 2, 2010, according to CNSNews.com's database of Afghanistan war casualties, U.S. military personnel suffered 452 combat-related deaths in Afghanistan. That amounts to more than half of the total of 900 combat-related fatalities suffered by U.S. forces in Afghanistan during the entire nine years of the war.

To see a month-by-month chart of U.S. combat casualties in Afghanistan since October 2001 click here.

There have also been 40 non-combat related U.S. casualties in Afghanistan since Obama's inauguration, bringing the total U.S. casualties in the country to 492 during Obama's presidency. Non-combat fatalities include soldiers who have drowned or died from vehicle or other accidents.

Each of the top five deadliest months of the war, accounting for both combat and non-combat deaths, have taken place during Obama's term. Those five months were:

1. June 2010 (59 casualties).
2. October 2009 (58 casualties).
3. August 2009 (51 deaths)
4. July 2009 (43 deaths)
5. September 2009 (37 deaths)

In all of 2009, there were 303 U.S. casualties (combat and non-combat) in Afghanistan, making it the deadliest year of the war, which started in October 2001. However, there were 199 U.S. casualties reported in Afghanistan in the first half of 2010 (January through June). That is more than double the 84 U.S. casualties that occurred in Afghanistan during the first half of 2009.

Last year, President Obama ordered an escalation in the U.S. troop strength in Afghanistan. As a candidate, he had vowed to shift the focus of U.S. military operations in the Middle East from Iraq to Afghanistan. The president's current policy is to begin withdrawing troops from Afghanistan one year from now, in July 2011.

President Barack Obama salutes the casket of a fallen soldier during a middle-of-the-night visit to Dover Air Force Base, Del., on Thursday, Oct. 29, 2009.About 42 percent of all combat and non-combat U.S. deaths have taken place since May 15, 2009, the day when troops from Obama’s first surge arrived in Afghanistan.

Speaking at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point on Dec. 2, 2009, Obama announced the deployment of 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan and said that in July 2011 he would begin withdrawing troops from Afghanistan “taking into account conditions on the ground.”

Since then, the president has maintained his policy that a drawdown will begin in July 2011, emphasizing that the date will mark the beginning of a transition “process” where tasks will be transferred to the Afghan government and its security forces.

Gen. David Petraeus, the top commander of U.S.-led NATO forces in Afghanistan, testified before Congress that the July 2011 drawdown date had not been recommended by him or any other military commander that he was aware of but that he agreed with it.

CNSNews.com’s casualty count is derived primarily from U.S. Defense Department casualty reports, but it also includes information gleaned from the news media

The count includes all U.S. military personnel who died or received fatal wounds in Afghanistan or Pakistan. It does not include U.S. soldiers who died outside of those two countries while supporting military efforts against terrorism under Operation Enduring Freedom, which includes multiple countries.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (87140)7/6/2010 9:46:00 PM
From: chartseer  Respond to of 224748
 
oh bummer! BP messed up so why hasn't those chicago politicians in the white house moved in and taken over?
When the saudis were in the white house how come those very same chicaco politicians in the white house didn't ask the saudis what to do to stop the leak and clean the mess up. The saudis are experienced in these matters while those chicago politicians in the white housr aren't.

Don't worry! Be happy!

the stupid hopeless comrade chartseer in the new era of those chicago politicians in the white house of not accepting any advice or any help from anyone



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (87140)7/6/2010 10:36:27 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224748
 
Recovery effort falls vastly short of BP's promises since BP has idiot odumba in their pockets



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (87140)7/7/2010 6:03:03 AM
From: tonto3 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224748
 
It is a strong reminder of Obama's poor decisions. He absolutely should have accepted foreign assistance offered to us. It was stupid not to do so then, and it is clear now that is was also reckless.