Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (87171)	7/7/2010 1:30:42 PM
From: mph	2 Recommendations Respond to of 224748

Maybe because recorded history is but a nanosecond in the life of the earth? If the data used to prove global warming were accurate, there would have been no reason to fake the outcome, would there? Or how about a little healthy skepticism of people who create a nonsense product called carbon credits and who make a fortune off so-called global warming? Sorry, I'm not a lemming.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (87171)	7/7/2010 2:18:33 PM
From: chartseer	Respond to of 224748

oh bummer! And all without setting a new world or a new western hemisphere record. Amazing! Unbelievable! Quite extra ordinary! Don't worry! Be happy! the stupid hopeless comrade chartseer in the new era of biased media and rewriting of history

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (87171)	7/7/2010 3:16:02 PM
From: chartseer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224748

oh bummer! what is truth? Never let the facts get in the way of your propaganda. "Moreover, NASA now also has to admit that three of the five warmest years on record occurred before 1940-it has up until now held that all five of them occurred after 1980." associatedcontent.com Don't worry! Be happy! the stupid hopeless comrade chartseer in the new era of never letting the facts get in the way of your propaganda

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (87171)	7/7/2010 3:33:09 PM
From: chartseer	Respond to of 224748

oh bummer! Explanation is a mathematical error to support and spread phoney propaganda. "According to H. Sterling Burnett, a senior fellow at the National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA), NASA scientist and famous man-made global warming proponent James Hansen's well-known claims that 1998 was measured as the warmest year on record in the U.S. were the result of a serious mathematical error. NASA has now corrected that error, and 1934 is now known as the warmest year on record, with 1921 the third warmest year instead of 2006 as was also previously claimed." Now this makes much more logical sense. Hottest temperature ever on record 1922 third hottest year 1921. Now your in the ball park even if it doesn't support your phoney claims. Don't worry! be happy! the stupid hopeless comrade chartseer in the new era of illogical propaganda spreading by brain numbed kool-aid drinkers.