SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Smithee who wrote (372071)7/8/2010 9:47:25 AM
From: alanrs1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793895
 
"It's a flawed argument."

How confident are you that a flawed argument won't carry the day? Since the GM bondholders got left high and dry and the dismissal of the Black Panther voting rights case I question the safe guards. How independent are the courts or the specific court where this will be heard?

ARS



To: Alan Smithee who wrote (372071)7/10/2010 1:33:23 AM
From: KLP  Respond to of 793895
 
I'd certainly like to see Arizona win this one! But... Grimm seemed to be focusing on this section when he made his judgement:

it talks about the preemption doctrine, the supremacy clause.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News