SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Metacomet who wrote (259293)7/8/2010 2:47:53 PM
From: bentwayRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Don't get me wrong, I still prefer him to the alternative. But, he could have done so much MORE. One thing Bush proved is, a president can pretty much do whatever he wants. He can be reversed by the conservative Supreme Court later, but, by then, often it really doesn't matter.



To: Metacomet who wrote (259293)7/8/2010 3:27:16 PM
From: Skeeter BugRespond to of 306849
 
>>First as a Constitutional scholar, and not a nitwit cowboy, he tends to operate in a manner bound by the existing legal framework.<<

puh-lease!

he said the patriot act was unconstitutional and still re-upped it with a full sign of unconstitutional approval.

got signing statements?

obama campaigned against them and now he loves them.

granted, the damage was done primarily by the clinton and bush bubbles - so that can't be blamed on obama.



To: Metacomet who wrote (259293)7/8/2010 4:32:10 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favorRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
So let's say this is all Bush's fault.....exactly when does it become Obama's economy/war/energy policy? After all he had a Dem Congress since 2006, so he should have had a running start.

Don't need an exact date, month and year would be fine.....