SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jim kelley who wrote (20863)11/7/1997 2:58:00 PM
From: Meathead  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 176387
 
Jim - no doubt, BTO excess inventory has been flushed and
Intel's Q4 numbers should improve, looks like a good time
to pick up additional shares of this undervalued giant.

Also, AMD appears to be doomed with thier yield problems
and lack of support from the big PC outfits.
news.com

Intel is the only volume supplier. Furthermore, Intel
has a strategy to capture and own the "new" sub 1000 segment.
crn.com

A bullseye on the impact of the sub 1000 PC courtesy of
Jeff Fox / Andy Grove
techstocks.com

PLUS....

An Oct 3, reiteration of Q3 confidence for Dell

news.com

MEATHEAD



To: jim kelley who wrote (20863)11/7/1997 4:02:00 PM
From: Chuzzlewit  Respond to of 176387
 
Two items, Jim,

First, I think INTC said that there were channel problems with some of their customers, and I think that you are right -- this corresponds to the switch to BTO. With WDC and INTC havingg dropped prices as a result of oversupply (failure to recognize BTO in INTC's case, and plain old competition in WDC's case), DELL is in a position to reap the most benefits because of its very short inventory cycle time.

Second, you noted that <<If you look at a 20 week comparison chart you will see DELL and CPQ moving as though joined at the hip.>> This is the point I was trying to make to people in discussing diversification. Portfolios should be diversified along different business segments in order to avoid the extreme covariance you typically see with CPQ, DELL and HWP.

Regards,

Paul



To: jim kelley who wrote (20863)11/7/1997 7:08:00 PM
From: Jerry G.  Respond to of 176387
 
You are right...maybe for our sakes they should be joined at the hip so us shareholders could make more money than we already have...