Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (123543)	7/11/2010 7:05:45 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

the science says not one highrise building in history with steel girders ever burnt or fell to the ground...until 911 when 3 went down...one w/o even a plane hitting it. what are the odds?

To: longnshort who wrote (123543)	7/11/2010 7:07:56 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

>>I don' think many people were near bldg 7.<< i linked the video of the guy running saying "move back, it is gonna blow" if you don't watch the links, you won't get the information. >>why would big brother target 7 and not the other,<< wtc7.net prisonplanet.com >>the Marriot Hotel was taken down who did that ?<< what are you talking about? what marriott hotel was taken at free fall acceleration? >>the science says it was carved out and the fires,<< no it doesn't - if that had done it would have fallen asymmetrically as the first point to lose support is the direction where the building would have collapse first. no building has ever fallen like that due to fires and some damage. ever. they fall like that ALL THE TIME when demolished, though. >>that's what mechanical science says, I believe their science.<< if you watched the video links, you would have heard the government's own employee say that free fall acceleration WAS NOT POSSIBLE and he explained WHY IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE. that was before they were forced to admit free fall acceleration for over 2 seconds. if you want to revel in ignorance, that's your choice. >>why did the gov want 7 down ?? give me a motive<< that's why we need a real investigation. the elites said a threat would allow them to institute a police state with military on our streets, allow them to surrender our rights via legislation like the patriot act and the current enemy belligerents act and they make a metric ton of money fighting wars and further enslave the nation in debt, which will ultimately allow them to end the constitution and institute a "new world order" run by unelected authoritarian bankers. that's what they wanted, that's what they got. did they do it? did they use drug running US intelligence agencies to help them do it? i don't know. investigate.