Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (8352)	7/13/2010 9:03:21 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

“What a pack of cowards you and Shep and Dak are.“ You’re the coward, SCUMBAG! My statement was utterly clear: I don’t have the facts to dismiss Supreme Beings (or at least very powerful and different beings than humans). I do, however, have the facts to dismiss all the Gods invented by man. The definition of God that you use (omnipotent, omniscient--all that crap) is risible and easily dismissed. It is a gratuitous concept that was utterly invented by humans but which has no logical or rational basis. But in honor of the truism stated (I believe by Arthur C. Clark) that any sufficiently advanced culture would be godlike to us, I also cannot dismiss the outside possibility of such advanced beings. Perhaps beings who could travel at he speed of light and walk through walls and stuff like that. But not one who fathers a world full of children and then murders all of them except for a drunkard! Not the God who is spoken of by default on these threads! We know that life teemed on the earth for MILLIONS of years before the myths of Genesis and such were invented. MILLIONS of years, you stupid dummkopf.