To: Knighty Tin who wrote (123596 ) 7/12/2010 3:31:11 PM From: Skeeter Bug 1 Recommendation Respond to of 132070 >>Of course he would object to a state law. He believes in corporation over individual and both over govt.<< i'm not so sure. ron paul was chastised for saying the federal government shouldn't be involved with the BP disaster, including setting artificially low liability agreements, btw (not good for corporations), but i heard what he actually said - he said the state governments had all the jurisdiction in the world to do what they felt was right to protect their state. his view of regulation is much more negative than mine, but he has a point - who watches the watchers? it is clear that the regulators are completely captured by hostile (to we, the people) uber corporations. also, i believe BOTH support ending the monopoly on money and credit issuance by private corporations - that's good for the people and bad for corporations. once again, your spin is misleading. btw, i think ron paul is very wrong when he says we need a gold standard monetary system - a gold system can be completely controlled by the uber rich people, too. history makes that clear. >>He may be racist. He may not be racist.<< that's a fair assessment - i don't know him and can't conclude he is or isn't racist based on the information presented. i'm glad you agree now. >>He agrees with racists on this issue.<< Knighty, is he a new black panther supporter because he believes the government shouldn't force the new black panther party can include whites? does ron paul share the views of the nation of islam because both agree the wars should be ended? racists also like the fact that 33% of african american babies are aborted... you support this, right? if so, you agree with racists. the kind of racist that is excited about ethnic genocide, too. i'd never suggest that you believed as they do. that would be wrong, correct?