Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (576142)	7/13/2010 10:59:25 AM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1571763

Suffer These Crimes in Oakland? Don't Call the Cops Dozens of layoffs effective at midnight, barring last minute deal By LORI PREUITT and KRIS SANCHEZ Updated 7:51 AM PDT, Tue, Jul 13, 2010 Oakland's police chief is making some dire claims about what his force will and will not respond to if layoffs go as planned. Chief Anthony Batts listed exactly 44 situations that his officers will no longer respond to and they include grand theft, burglary, car wrecks, identity theft and vandalism. He says if you live and Oakland and one of the above happens to you, you need to let police know on-line. Some 80 officers were to be let go at midnight last night if a last-minute deal was not reached. That's about ten percent of the work force. That deadline has been extended to Tuesday morning with a possible council vote at 10:30 a.m. Here's a partial list: * burglary * theft * embezzlement * grand theft * grand theft:dog * identity theft * false information to peace officer * required to register as sex or arson offender * dump waste or offensive matter * discard appliance with lock * loud music * possess forged notes * pass fictitious check * obtain money by false voucher * fraudulent use of access cards * stolen license plate * embezzlement by an employee (over $ 400) * extortion * attempted extortion * false personification of other * injure telephone/ power line * interfere with power line * unauthorized cable tv connection * vandalism * administer/expose poison to another's Negotiations are going on at Oakland City Hall in the mayor's office. Batts has only been chief since last October. "I came here to build an organization, not to downsize one," Batts said. Batts said the 80 officers slated to be laid off - mostly new officers - are "pretty sad and pretty depressed," and those feelings are shared by the Police Department as a whole. The Oakland City Council voted June 25 to eliminate the positions to help close the city's $32.5 million funding gap. According to the city of Oakland, each of the 776 police officers currently employed at OPD costs around $188,000 per year. Most of the officers who will be affected by the layoffs were on the streets of Oakland when Johannes Mehserle's involuntary manslaughter conviction caused riots last Thursday. The sticking point in negotiations appears to be job security. The city council asked OPD officers to pay nine percent of their salary toward their pensions, which would save the city about $7.8 million toward a multi-million dollar deficit. The police union agreed, as long as the city could promise no layoffs for three years. No dice, says city council president Jane Brunner. "We wish we could offer them a three-year no layoff protection we just can't financially.It would be irresponsible of us," Brunner said. The city agreed to a one-year moratorium on layoffs, but it is not enough for the union. The problem is money. In the last five years, the police budget -- along with the fire department budget -- have amount to 75 percent of the general fund. After years of largely sparing those departments the budget ax, now it appears there are few other places to cut. These are the last hours of negotiation and Brunner is hopeful that the city and police will find some sort middle ground. "It's been very good conversation and not a whole lot of grandstanding." Brunner said. "There's actually real conversations. Each side understands the problem," she said.

To: Road Walker who wrote (576142)	7/13/2010 1:38:03 PM
From: tejek	1 Recommendation Respond to of 1571763

I’m no friend of the deficit hawks, but the staggering amounts of money we’ve been spending for the past several years have not benefited the people most in need of help and have not laid the foundation for a more secure economy going forward. We’ve handed over unconscionable tax breaks to the very rich (you can see the Prada paraders high-stepping along Fifth Avenue in their million-dollar flip-flops) and countless billions to the private contractors brazenly feeding off the agony of the endless wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. If this country doesn't start leveling the playing field......and soon, its going to be in serious trouble. These reality shows like the Real Housewives......read very rich housewives.....and celebs like the Paris Hiltons and the Tiger Woods flaunting their wealth and these multi million dollar contracts handed over to frigging jocks like the LeBron James......while the banks continue to screw people.....just rub into the faces of the average American how bad off their situation is and how the rich continue to get by unscathed. The tea baggers talk about revolution......I've got news for them....they need to step aside because there is a bigger revolution brewing.