SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (24832)11/7/1997 3:43:00 PM
From: go4it  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35569
 
Please let me know when it is alright to come back to the thread and discuss IPM with intelligent people interested in the truth. Everyone knows that Charters is an uninformed soon to be broke short.

If there is anyone wishing to find unbiased information please feel free to E-mail me and as always I will try to help out when ever I can. The truth is out there, I have found it and IPM is the future of mining.

Later Gator,

Chuck



To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (24832)11/7/1997 4:00:00 PM
From: BobS  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Larry,

There are some fights that just aren't worth fighting - it's sometimes better to walk away. I agree with Peter - this is one of those times.

Yes, people are posting false, negative information about IPM & Naxos. So what? If they have any effect on the stock price (which I doubt is much), it is a short term effect. Us longs are in the stock for the great potential of a breakthrough in mining. A point up or down over a 5-day period doesn't make a damn bit of difference. Who cares? If shorts can make money off that point - let 'em. I don't care. I'm not in it for a point move, I'm not in it for 5 days. I'm in it to see if IPM can find a way to mine PGMs from previously unmineable elements. Period.

The number of posts I read has dramatically decreased - and that includes not only Charters, Bill J., & Thall. It includes yours, Geralds, etc. When y'all decide to post factual information, as I fondly remember you did previously, I'll gladly return to read the posts. I enjoyed the information exchange before. I'm certainly not enjoying the thread now.

bobs.



To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (24832)11/7/1997 4:28:00 PM
From: Proton  Respond to of 35569
 
Re: Be Careful What You Ask

What would you have us do, let the shorties run the thread?

They already do. They set the tone (dissonant, to be sure), specify the agenda, and -- with their nemises among our number -- clog the thread for anyone other form of discourse.