Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (24834)	11/7/1997 3:38:00 PM
From: Alan Vennix	Respond to of 35569

Getting a little desperate, eh? Shorts getting a little tight? Relax. Wouldn't want you to burst a blood vessel and spew garbage all over SI - or maybe that's already happenned.

To: E. Charters who wrote (24834)	11/7/1997 5:02:00 PM
From: Bob Jagow	Respond to of 35569

Pill alert! Perhaps you should switch to IV, EC, your mood swings are truly textbook stuff. In case you come down, check ipmcf.com and see if it fits your March hypothesis. DrBob

To: E. Charters who wrote (24834)	11/7/1997 8:30:00 PM
From: Mark H...	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

THE LEVELS OF PRECIOUS METALS ASSAYED WERE LESS THAN 5 THOUSANDTHS OF AN OUNCE PER TON. INTERESTING TO BE SURE SINCE THEN THERE HAS BEEN NO SUCCESSFUL INDEPENDENT TEST OF THE BLACK ROCK AREA. As I recall, the assay levels were 0.046 oz/ton, which is less than 5 HUNDREDTHS of an ounce per ton, not THOUSANDTHS. If you are going to pretend to be our friend, warning us of the horrible dangers of investing in IPMCF, then at least keep your facts straight. For any newbies that may be worried, this was still regarded as a minable resource (if production efficiencies are as good as assay numbers). Some mines are operating profitably with far lower grades. IPM is working to prove the grades are much higher than that. BD has at least verified the 0.046 number. Mark Haythornthwaite