Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Vennix who wrote (24845)	11/7/1997 4:16:00 PM
From: Matt C. Austin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

I understand you guy's viewpoints but I'm not going to let these people destroy the veracity of some fine people. The longs that have been in for a long time understand what's going on here. New lurkers can be influenced by this smear campaign and I want them to see for themselves that Chatters and the others are not telling them the true story. In the last few hours, he's destroyed what little veracity he's ever had. Only a fool would refute what B D and Ledoux have stated in their assay reports. Eventually he'll go away -- until then I'm going to keep showing people what he's really all about. Whether you understand it or not - it's my way of repaying the excellent DD that Lew, Chuck and many others have given to all of us.

To: Alan Vennix who wrote (24845)	11/7/1997 4:47:00 PM
From: Proton	Respond to of 35569

You make some good points and I apologize for the thread pollution my posts have caused. Well, goodness knows I am not without sin in this regard, Alan. In fact, I'm sure there are more than a few people who think what I am posting is polluting as well. Your signal-to-noise ratio (including your great work with the Index) needs no apology. Matt and Larry (and you) make a fair point: the extraordinary mendacity and disingenuousness exhibited by E.C. and his ilk are difficult to tolerate. I like your idea of presenting factual and logical rebuttals to the worst of his nonsense. I think it's the raw volume of posts, combined with other factors, that really got to several of us this week. Not that I'm transferring any anxiety about delays in The Report, of course (I'll leave that diagnosis to Dave Bissett :-] )! Pý