Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : S3 (A LONGER TERM PERSPECTIVE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jan A. Van Hummel who wrote (7565)	11/7/1997 4:15:00 PM
From: Rob C.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14577

Jan, Lawsuits are for crybabies...they only benefit the attorneys. Why does'nt everyone stop bitching, vote GJ out and start the company on the right track. Regards, Rob

To: Jan A. Van Hummel who wrote (7565)	11/7/1997 4:25:00 PM
From: Tom Terf	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14577

Management knew that by issuing the "accounting error" garbage they would be getting sued by the shareholders. They did it, however, to cut their legal losses. Crimminal, that is. If the SEC gets a hold of this, it will now be easier to wedge their way out of crimminal stuff since they were upfront, they believe. That is their hope, of course. The civil stuff from the vulture lawyers was a foregone conclusion. However, the civil proceedings could demonstrate probable cause relative to intent. If this happens, the FEDs may be forced to step in, if it has not already occured sooner. I would not be surprised if some of us injured shareholders (and mutual FUND MANAGERS who were hung out to dry) don't petition the FEDs to look into this matter independent of the suit.. The 10Q filing which the Company has advised will describe this ordeal in detail, may also be the catalyst. That's the biggest danger legally going forward for both the Company, its deceptive managers .. and us, the poor shareholders.