Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (8565)	7/17/2010 1:54:32 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 69300

<<<“The bible itself qualifies as documentary evidence.“>>> "Oh? So there is corroborative evidence and a logical rationale to support the story...." The existence or lack thereof of corroborating testimony does nothing to diminish the independent status of the biblical documents among Historical scholars as "documentary evidence". Ignorance and immature belligerence are your stock and trade. Real historians recognize that the biblical documents (especially the New Testament documents) constitute eyewitness historical claims. Historical Scholars who are not Christians readily admit this even if they deny the claims themselves.

To: Solon who wrote (8565)	7/17/2010 2:23:07 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

<<<“you have already stated that the only reason that you would object to it is because it is currently illegal“>>> "Of course, you could show me a post where I claimed what you are alleging?" <<<Yes, I could.>>> "I supported the RIGHT of all people to engage in any sexual acts they chose to PROVIDED it was legal" Message 26624998 ..................................................... "I supported the RIGHT of all people to engage in any sexual acts they chose to PROVIDED it was legal" Message 26624998 Pedophiles are people and anal sex with boys is a sexual act which you have championed here repeatedly as a "RIGHT" .......................................... "I don’t think that has anything to do with Pedophilia" Why? Don't you believe that Pedophiles/Pederasts are people? Do you also deny that Pederasts/Pedophiles who have sex with children "choose" the "sexual act"? What you tried to do was to redefine pederasty to mean sex between consenting adults when the dictionary definition and the context of the discussion had to do with sex ("usually anal") between adult men and boys.