Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (577108)	7/19/2010 8:28:58 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574596

Ted, > Was it not possible to put the panels on the roof? That would have made more economic sense. You know, that's a very good question. Other sites have rooftop solar panels. There is one site in either Bangalore or Israel (I forget where) which is labeled Intel's "greenest site." Among other things, it has solar panels and a garden on the roof. That helps with the efficiency of cooling the office. When I go up to Northern California, I hope to meet people who are on the forefront of renewable energy. I'm generally a skeptic because of my personality, but I'm also a big believer in the multi-pronged approach toward energy independence. Tenchusatsu

To: tejek who wrote (577108)	7/19/2010 8:52:33 PM
From: TopCat	1 Recommendation Respond to of 1574596

"Secondly, thinking of Murphy's Law, are solar panels and their output increasing in accordence with the theory behind Murphy's Law." Er...are you thinking of Moore's Law? You're an example of Murphy's law. Anything than can go wrong....will go wrong.