SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: john dodson who wrote (22009)11/8/1997 12:07:00 AM
From: Jack Whitley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 61433
 
<<WHY would AT&T divest LU, only to buy ASND now? Makes zero sense
to me.>>

Because they made a terrible mistake when they divested "Lucent". Their switched voice network (which we have to jack-leg data through now)looked like such a huge asset 2 1/2 years ago, now looks like a not so great asset.

What they (AT&T) have left is long distance service, and it is quickly becoming a commodity. Rates will drop by another 30% in two years. They have nothing else, and some very hungry competitors, who are actually positioned better strategically in terms of data network build out than AT&T is.

If they want to participate in the build out of the great IP network that will be carrying all of our voice in 5 years (and all the voice traffic on this IP network will account for 1% of the total traffic), they better buy someone.

By the way, ISPs are NOT consolidating on a large scale. It doesn't really matter, ports can't consolidate. Does anyone think we will need a lot more ports going forward no matter whose roof they are under?

jww



To: john dodson who wrote (22009)11/8/1997 5:32:00 PM
From: Captain James T. Kirk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 61433
 
AT&T is the sum of a whole. I suggest no divesting to occur, however Bay/Asnd, then later to join with Lucent, will build a base that can aid At&T to take hold against Giant Wcom.