Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : APA optics...APAT...very interesting..any thoughts....... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Duane L. Olson who wrote (191)	11/8/1997 2:51:00 AM
From: golfinggramps	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 342

Duane, Glad to see you had a successful trip. Thanks for the post, it is appreciated. For folks that follow APAT, our friend Auric is trying to make the amended 10-KSB big news. The figures he used compares March, 1996 to March 1997. Fiscal year end for APAT is March 31. We are now in the second quarter of fiscal year 1998. What it amounts to is year end March 31,1996, APAT had a backlog of $4,000,000.00 in research and development contracts. Fiscal year end, March 31, 1997, APAT had a backlog $3,200,000.00 in research and development contracts. Thus the difference in both backlog and increased revenues over the prior year. Don't want to be-labor the idea that Auric has a real bad attitude towards APAT and I am only answering his remarks because the guy has really pi$$ed me off. Duane, look forward to hearing from you and keep an eye on APAT. Hit Em Straight. Jim

To: Duane L. Olson who wrote (191)	11/9/1997 2:18:00 AM
From: LPasko	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 342

I see our friend Mr. Goldfinger has started his own thread. Although he is opinionated, and a bit caustic, I think we're all big boys and girls here and can stomach a few strongly expressed opinions (and even a few non-profane jibes regarding our ignorance). Frankly, I haven't yet bought the stock and Auric's posts have provided some food for thought; I don't know if he's dead right or dead wrong. He does provide a different slant on the news, such as we can ascertain it. Perhaps he should tone down a bit, but I don't agree generally with exiling dissenters from any thread. Just my two cents.