SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (578377)7/28/2010 2:32:03 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572758
 
"He's saying that actions are the sum of experience and genetics, and you have no control over either so no moral responsibility for your actions, regardless of outcome."

The disagreement is easy. Choice and intention are not determined solely be predisposing experience and genetics. Actions are impacted by "predisposing experience and genetics," and by circumstantial influences which are present and outside the control of the 'actor', but conscious consideration regarding intended actions according to moral principle is not pre-programmed. You have free will and you are responsible for your choices. There may be other's responsible and contributing to a particular action, even one you are performing but you are responsible for your conscious choices.



To: Road Walker who wrote (578377)7/28/2010 6:04:53 PM
From: Tenchusatsu1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572758
 
RW, > He's saying that actions are the sum of experience and genetics, and you have no control over either so no moral responsibility for your actions, regardless of outcome.

I heard this before. Evolution professor at Cornell University, Will Provine, argued that we have no free will.

Maybe Tiger Woods should have used that excuse ...

Tenchusatsu