Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (578485)	7/29/2010 12:35:17 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578452

Taro, arrogant liberals think that "science" consists of reading articles from NPR and accepting them at face value. If not for people who take on important causes and study the effects of mankind of the world, folks you label so wantonly and cynically, the world would be a far darker place in which to live...so thank these people now and then for the air you breathe and the water you drink...and yes, I tend towards a listening ear...unlike you and the band of cynical envirophobes with which you seem to identify. Al

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (578485)	7/29/2010 3:20:40 PM
From: Taro	Respond to of 1578452

...a little trick I like to call "math." Something the arrogant libtards still refuse to learn. Vodoo lib science beats math at any time. "Man, this libshit is easy!" /Taro

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (578485)	8/1/2010 11:47:15 AM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578452

"That was a little trick I like to call "math." Something the arrogant libtards still refuse to learn." There are little things called "chemistry" and "physics" which wingnuts seem to be unaware of. Oxygen in the atmosphere has a residence time of about 4500 years, it isn't zero like you are pretending. In addition, you seem to be neglecting the fact that phytoplankton lives in the water, so it takes some time for it to enter the atmosphere, or not enter depending on what you are trying to measure. Still, if plankton production is off by 40% over the past few decades, shouldn't we have been able to measure some change? The answer appears to be yes. blogcritics.org Granted, the article fingers combustion as the primary reason. But, even then, the decrease is greater than expected. But, continue butt-slapping each other on your "victory"...