SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul V. who wrote (10533)11/8/1997 12:35:00 PM
From: Big Bucks  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 70976
 
PV.
Leading edge companies are just starting to ramp
into full 0.25uM production. It will likely take
4-6 months to really be running in a full production
mode in the newest fabs as the "bugs" are worked out
and production yields are approaching their maximum
output. Lithography and etching are still the
most likely bottlenecks as the transition occurs.
It seems that it takes about 1 1/2 - 2 years between
device generation changes to move to the "next"
evolution in technology.
One point to consider is that each decrease in
geometries also has a cooresponding decrease
in voltage required to power the devices on the
chip. The implications of this are that the
end users also have to engineer their products
to use the reduced voltages in their designs and
still maintain compatiblity with other devices
and hardware that is available on the market.
Mixing different voltage devices causes unnecessary
engineering difficulty and requires additional
voltage regulation devices on circuit cards which
increases cost and complicates designs. This is
a major reason that product manufacturers may not fully
endorse new chip designs immediately until there
is a ready supply of supporting chips to enable
their designs efficiently, plus the cost comes
down as more chip manufactureres are competing on
pricing at the reduced geometries.
My opinion is that it will take about 2 years before
the next generation of devices is necessary which will
require upgrades to existing equipment and replacement
of specific equipment that can't perform at the
required level necessary for advanced devices.
300mm equipment will likely start at 0.25uM but be
capable of 0.18uM production with necessary hardware
or process changes.
The caveat is the lithoghraphy efficiency/accuracy,
it depends on whether DUV or another more robust
technology proves to be the winner in the long term.
My bet is with ion milling or x-ray to make the
subsequent generations of devices below 0.18uM.

Just my opinion,
BB



To: Paul V. who wrote (10533)11/8/1997 1:16:00 PM
From: Tito L. Nisperos Jr.  Respond to of 70976
 
Paul V, Cary is right...You see, INTC's strategy is to compete in all the different price segments of the computer chip market. We will be seeing price-cuttings in the chip making as well as in the computer making arena as demand increases for their wares---all to the delight of businesses and consumers. The competition will be fierce, so as to make AMAT and other Semi-Equips (who are supplying the weapons for the combatants) to be more busy than ever...The move to smaller geometries and larger wafers will come sooner than we are expecting!...But that takes some time, in the meantime Cheaper chips via Cheaper labor will play center stage...