SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (25658)11/8/1997 1:01:00 AM
From: Investor A  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1579906
 
Ali,

No Good, no good!

Both Cyrix and AMD need more time to ramp up the production. It is the time to replace all servers with K6 and M2.

Are you entitled for the full refund from Intel?
exchange2000.com
tgross.com
Call Intel at 800-628-8686



To: Ali Chen who wrote (25658)11/10/1997 1:21:00 AM
From: Petz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1579906
 
Ali, is this bad opcode 16 bits wide? If so, and especially if there's some "don't care" bits in the 16 bit field, I find Intel's claim that this could no happen accidentally quite unbelievable. Who's to say this bit pattern isn't the middle bytes of some floating point number sitting in memory that accidentally gets jumped to by a buggy program. (Yea, right, Netscape and Microsoft don't have bugs.)

Petz


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News