Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Real Man who wrote (29432)	7/30/2010 3:16:07 PM
From: carranza2	2 Recommendations Respond to of 71403

Acting Man suggests the reasons behind the fuss over the BIS gold swaps: acting-man.com It has now… …turned out that Philip Klapwijk of GFMS had exactly the right idea – European banks have used unallocated gold belonging to their customers to finance themselves cheaply, and they apparently did that just ahead of the 'stress test' farce – perhaps in order to make themselves look more financially sound than they really are. Most likely though it was the problems these banks encountered in obtaining dollar funding in the interbank lending market that occasioned the transaction. Of course that is not the official story – officially, it was the BIS initiating the swaps in order to 'earn a return on its huge dollar holdings'. That 'explanation' is of course completely absurd. As the FT reports today, under the title "BIS gold swaps mystery is unraveled" (well hidden away on page 18): "Three big banks – HSBC, Société Générale and BNP Paribas – were among more than 10 based in Europe that swapped gold with the Bank for International Settlements in a series of unusual deals that caused confusion in the gold market and left traders scratching their heads." The Financial Times has learned that the swaps, which were initiated by the BIS, came as the so-called “central banks’ bank” sought to obtain a return on its huge US dollar-denominated holdings. The BIS asked the commercial banks to pledge a gold swap as guarantee for the dollar deposits they were taking from the Basel-based institution" Some analysts speculated that the swap deals were a surreptitious bail-out of the European banking system ahead of last week’s publication of stress tests. But bankers and officials have described the transactions as “mutually beneficial”. “The client approached us with the idea of buying some gold with the option to sell it back,” said one European banker, referring to the BIS. Another banker said: “From time to time, central banks or the BIS want to optimise the return on their currency holdings.” Nonetheless, two central bank officials said some of the commercial banks also needed the US dollar funding and were keen to act as a counterparty with the BIS. The gold swaps began in December and surged in January, when the Greek debt crisis erupted and European commercial banks were facing funding problems. Jaime Caruana, head of the BIS, told the FT the swaps were “regular commercial activities” for the bank." Yes, it's all 'perfectly normal' and it sure was 'mutually beneficial' – except for the fact that what was used was apparently mostly unallocated gold the banks concerned held in deposits for their customers. As the FT further explains: “The gold swaps were, in effect, a form of collateral against the US-dollar deposits placed by the BIS with commercial banks. Gold is widely regarded as one of the safest assets, but has not been widely used as collateral in the past. Mr Caruana described the transactions as “loans with a guarantee”. Investors have bought physical gold in record amounts during the past two years and deposited it in commercial banks. European financial institutions are awash with bullion and some are trying to pledge gold as a guarantee.” Yep, gold deposits belonging to the banks' customers – this is a form of fractionally reserved gold banking in other words, where the banks use assets that belong to their customers for their own profit. And this is legal why exactly? We know of course that it is 'legal' de iure, we merely note that this privilege enjoyed by the banks flies in the face of every common sense interpretation of property rights. Just in case people have not really understood the implications at that point, the FT makes them unambiguously clear in the next paragraph: “The gold used in the swaps came mainly from investors’ deposit accounts at the European commercial banks. Some investors prefer to deposit their gold in so-called “allocated accounts”, which restrict the custodian banks’ ability to use the gold in their market operations by assigning them specific bullion bars. But other investors prefer cheaper “unallocated accounts”, which give banks access to their bullion for their day-to-day operations. Officials said other commercial banks obtained the gold from the lending market, borrowing bullion from emerging countries’ central banks." There you have it. As we said before, if you have gold in an 'unallocated account' , be aware that the bank can do with it whatever it likes. Your gold is often simply not 'there'. What there is instead, is a piece of paper that 'represents' your gold. Many gold depositors probably know this, if they have bothered to read the fine print – but many may not be aware of it, and simply have opted for unallocated accounts because they are cheaper than allocated ones. It seems unlikely that the banks pay their gold depositors one red cent for the privilege of doing whatever they want with their gold – but in all likelihood they continue to charge storage fees for it, whether it is or isn't physically present. As we remarked before, this completely defeats the purpose of gold ownership – after all, people inter alia buy gold precisely because they want to be insured against a potential systemic collapse. A 'gold receivable' with your gold used as collateral in the bank's own name insures you against nothing at all.

To: Real Man who wrote (29432)	7/30/2010 9:22:56 PM
From: Secret_Agent_Man	3 Recommendations Respond to of 71403

BIS Gold Swaps Mystery Is Unravelled By Jack Farchy and Javier Blas in London Financial Times, London Thursday, July 29, 2010 ft.com Three big banks -- HSBC, Societe Generale, and BNP Paribas -- were among more than 10 based in Europe that swapped gold with the Bank for International Settlements in a series of unusual deals that caused confusion in the gold market and left traders scratching their heads. The mystery of who was involved in deals with the BIS, the bank for central banks, and what they were doing, has become clearer. The Financial Times has learnt that the swaps, which were initiated by the BIS, came as the so-called "central banks' bank" sought to obtain a return on its huge US dollar-denominated holdings. The BIS asked the commercial banks to pledge a gold swap as guarantee for the dollar deposits they were taking from the Basel-based institution. When news of the swaps, which were disclosed in a note to the BIS's latest annual report, circulated among traders this month, it caused a sharp fall in the gold price, sending bullion to what was then six-week lows. Gold has since fallen further: It was trading at $1,164 an ounce on Thursday. Some analysts speculated that the swap deals were a surreptitious bailout of the European banking system ahead of last week's publication of stress tests. But bankers and officials have described the transactions as "mutually beneficial." "The client approached us with the idea of buying some gold with the option to sell it back," said one European banker, referring to the BIS. Another banker said: "From time to time, central banks or the BIS want to optimise the return on their currency holdings." Nonetheless, two central bank officials said some of the commercial banks also needed the US dollar funding and were keen to act as a counterparty with the BIS. The gold swaps began in December and surged in January, when the Greek debt crisis erupted and European commercial banks were facing funding problems. Jaime Caruana, head of the BIS, told the FT the swaps were "regular commercial activities" for the bank. In a short note in its annual report, published at the end of June, the BIS said it had taken 346 tonnes of gold in exchange for foreign currency in "swap operations" in the financial year to March 31. In the same fiscal year, the BIS took three times the amount of currency deposits it had taken the previous year as central banks around the world became concerned about using commercial banks for their deposits and turned to the Basel institution. In a gold swap, one counterparty, in this case a bank, sells its gold to the other, in this case the BIS, with an agreement to buy it back at a later date. The gold swaps were, in effect, a form of collateral against the US dollar deposits placed by the BIS with commercial banks. Gold is widely regarded as one of the safest assets, but has not been widely used as collateral in the past. Mr Caruana described the transactions as "loans with a guarantee." Investors have bought physical gold in record amounts during the past two years and deposited it in commercial banks. European financial institutions are awash with bullion and some are trying to pledge gold as a guarantee. George Milling-Stanley, managing director for government affairs at the industry-backed World Gold Council, said: "The gold swaps commercial banks carried out with the BIS demonstrate the effectiveness of gold as an asset class, because even in the depths of the worst liquidity crisis in living memory, institutions with access to gold were able to make use of it to generate dollar liquidity. The issue also feeds right into the current debate among Asian central banks about the lack of assets suitable for use as cross-border collateral." Last year, CME Group, the world's largest derivatives exchange, allowed investors to use gold futures as collateral for some operations. Other institutions, such as central banks, had begun using and requesting gold as collateral in the past two years as perceptions of counterparty risk have risen, bankers and officials said. The gold used in the swaps came mainly from investors' deposit accounts at the European commercial banks. Some investors prefer to deposit their gold in so-called "allocated accounts," which restrict the custodian banks' ability to use the gold in their market operations by assigning them specific bullion bars. But other investors prefer cheaper "unallocated accounts," which give banks access to their bullion for their day-to-day operations. Officials said other commercial banks obtained the gold from the lending market, borrowing bullion from emerging countries' central banks.