SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (265306)7/31/2010 9:54:44 AM
From: arun geraRespond to of 306849
 
>my guess is every time they "close a bank," they give the assets to one of their buddy banks and then write them a big fat check and leave society with the debt.>

This is being done so openly that it is amazing that people are not talking about it at every gathering. There is a resistance in human beings to see something that makes them feel insecure about their future. Whenever, I bring this up in discussions with friends, they just ignore it. People think that bad things cannot happen to them, only to other less fortunate or capable. This is a transfer of everyone's assets/savings to the federal government and institutions (banks, large companies such as GE, GM that are guaranteed funding) closest to the federal government.

-Arun



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (265306)7/31/2010 11:41:16 AM
From: Giordano BrunoRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Evidently the Justice Dept. still doesn't understand the subtleties of the the municipal reinvestment market other than taxpayers being repeatedly fleeced.

July 31, 2010
noir.bloomberg.com

The charges are “without merit and in fact, a total fiction based on a lack of understanding of the municipal reinvestment market,” CDR said in a statement on its Web site.

Haven't we heard that before?

October 30, 2009
articles.latimes.com

September 28, 2007
sec.gov

“The whole investment process was rigged across the board,” said Charlie Anderson, who retired in 2007 as head of field operations for the Internal Revenue Service’s tax-exempt bond division. “It was so commonplace that people talked about it on the phones of their employers and ignored the fact that they were being recorded.”

In a nutshell CDR is accused of giving local municipalities false information and then funneled insider info to banks. With the extra profits from these ill gotten gains the banks would then allegedly kickback the money to CDR. In some cases such as Jefferson County Alabama, the results were disastrous. Of course some of these municipalities it was more then getting false information, it was also alleged influence peddeling that allowed those deals to go forward.

46in08.blogspot.com

Seems criminal.
It's not.



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (265306)7/31/2010 10:45:57 PM
From: Smiling BobRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
I'm seeing something very similar on a smaller scale
A 7 figure estate was left to me which is being contested. It's in another state
Judge appoints temporary administrator whom is a friend of his and a fellow judge. The guy is cleaning it out and recklessly handling and there's not a thing I can do about it. I'm now on my 3rd lawyer who might be a little less fearful of rattling the cage, due to his age. Another local friend of theirs is suing estate and TA is "defending." Contesting lawyer also closely tied.
They're all working together to strip/transfer the assets.
At the rate it's going, I could end up with bus fare.