Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (579145)	8/2/2010 2:39:07 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572105

Confirming several other recent surveys, the latest Florida Poll shows Gov. Charlie Crist (I) leading this year's Senate race with 41% support. Marco Rubio (R) is second with 30%, followed by Rep. Kendrick Meek (D) with 12%. Vaja con dios rubio... I don't think Dios wants anything to do with Señor Rubio.

To: Alighieri who wrote (579145)	8/2/2010 4:10:49 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572105

I can't decide if Cantor is more honest than the average R, or just dumber and has trouble memorizing GOP talking points. QUOTE OF THE DAY.... Throughout July, Republican leaders were aggressive in touting their belief in the Tax Fairy -- there's no need to worry about paying for tax cuts, because they magically pay for themselves. It was a startling example of "invincible ignorance," but from the Senate Minority Leader to unelected GOP candidates, this was the official party line. This morning on MSNBC, House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) accidentally noted the truth about Republican demands to extend Bush's tax cuts. Host Savannah Guthrie asked Cantor if he would "simply acknowledge that passing these tax cuts worsens the budget deficit problem." Cantor dodged, arguing that people don't want to see "a tax hike." So, Guthrie tried again, asking if Cantor "had any dispute with the notion that it does exacerbate the deficit picture." The Republican replied, "What I said in the beginning is, um, if you have less revenues coming into the federal government, and more expenditures, what does that add up to? Certainly you're gonna dig the hole deeper. But you also have to understand, if the priority is to get people back to work, is to start growing this economy again, uh, then you don't wanna make it more expensive for job creators." [see vid clip] That's quite a concession. Cantor is willing to admit that tax cuts would "dig the whole deeper" when it comes to the deficit -- a fact that's consistent with common sense, but which Republicans have fought vehemently for a month -- but believes the economy is more important than the deficit. Oddly enough, I consider this something of a breakthrough. For 18 months, Democrats, most notably President Obama, have said the deficit matters, but the state of the economy matters more. Republicans and their Tea Party base have argued the opposite, insisting that the deficit has to take priority; we're facing a debt crisis; etc. Cantor's line, repeated as if it were obvious, puts Republicans in a different place -- if boosting the economy means "digging the hole deeper," so be it. I happen to agree wholeheartedly. At this point, then, it's time for a different debate. For a year and a half, it's been economic growth vs. deficit reduction. Cantor is signaling a new argument -- economic growth through spending vs. economic growth through tax cuts. Instead of arguing over whether to increase the deficit, Cantor seems prepared to concede the point, and argue deficit increases are unfortunately necessary. Democrats should welcome his new-found wisdom, and initiate a discussion over the efficacy of spending vs. the efficacy of tax cuts. Since we already know we get a much better bang for the buck when it comes to spending, it's an argument Republicans will lose, at least if reality had any bearing on the outcome of policy debates. washingtonmonthly.com