Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (376521)	8/4/2010 5:05:27 PM
From: Bill	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794349

Judge strikes down -- IN 138 PAGE RULING -- 'Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California'... Dogs, cousins and threesomes all over California are celebrating!

To: KLP who wrote (376521)	8/4/2010 10:33:51 PM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794349

One wonders whether people of the same sex wanting to marry are equally committed to the obligations they are assuming: Divorce, alimony, taxes, child custody, inheritance, and so forth. In custody fights, the mother in heterosexual marriage usually has an advantage whether it is fair or unfair. In same-sex marriage, how would this be covered since there is no way to differentiate?

To: KLP who wrote (376521)	8/4/2010 10:40:14 PM
From: goldworldnet	5 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 794349

I feel so sorry for children with same sex parents. It's wrong for a child to have to deal with that. * * *