Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : BuSab -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (4520)	8/6/2010 5:19:39 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 23934

There are two right answers to the gay marriage question. 1. Government gets out of the business of marriage and only deals with the legal issues of the partnership. Straight, gay, bi, whatever....they all get civil unions. Churches can then grant marriages...or not, if they don't want to. 2. Since we are all equal in the eyes of the law, since the government is in the business of marriage between a man and a woman, they must extend the same to any adults who want to get married. This one issue automatically alienates up to about 10% of our citizens. There are gay men and women who believe in what the US Constitution says. But how could they vote for a politician who doesn't believe that they deserve the same rights and privileges that other adults enjoy? For those who bring up the 7 million california votes, it is important to remember that we aren't a democracy. The democrats want us to believe that "majority rules" is justification for ignoring the constitution. How absurd is it for conservatives to fall back to that same argument with regard to the Prop 8 vote. Let's use the "separate but equal" school example. If today we decided to vote to segregate schools again so that blacks could go to their schools and whites could go to theirs (and asians and indians etc.....). If 80% of the population voted to uphold separate but equal segregation, would it be ok because the majority approved it? The answer is no, because it is unconstitutional. Separate but equal doesn't work for non-heterosexuals as well. I said it elsewhere, but I'll support a gay conservative over a straight progressive any day of the week. We need to focus on what is truly important, not how others decide to keep house. Report TOU Violation Message 26737924