SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Little Joe who wrote (377397)8/9/2010 11:19:59 PM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793964
 
The bottom line is no matter how you slice it, you are paying people for no production. How can that help the economy?

People who receive welfare/stimulus funds spend all the money that they receive. That (obviously) helps the economy.

In a nutshell, if I give $10 to someone and he spends it all, that seems better for the economy than me taking my same $10 and putting it in my bank account, where it sits in perpetuity (earning 0.35% interest per annum).

There's a tipping point where that idea loses steam, but it's not a few percentage points here and there in the tax code.



To: Little Joe who wrote (377397)8/10/2010 3:37:47 AM
From: Joe Btfsplk1 Recommendation  Respond to of 793964
 
paying people for no production

Or, for efforts expended not directed by buyer's desires expressed with their own earnings. These pukes are incrementally recreating the incentives that made the old Soviet Union such a delight.

Adding insult to injury, they're only accelerating trends long in place.