Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Valuepro who wrote (268798)	8/13/2010 12:17:15 AM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

>>Wait a minute. Is Congress without fault? You could blame everything you want on Bush, and I think you do, but how is it he is so responsible for all this when Congress was/is controlled by another party<< Dude, when bush took over the Republicans controlled the congress and never vetoed one bill. They did two of the three tax cuts for the rich using reconciliation, which is why they are expiring. 51 votes.

To: Valuepro who wrote (268798)	8/13/2010 12:20:43 AM
From: bentway	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 306849

"but how is it he is so responsible for all this when Congress was/is controlled by another party?" Bush had an (R) congress until 2006. Clinton had six years of an (R) congress. That's TWELVE YEARS of (R) congress, and six with an (R) president! No wonder we're so totally screwed NOW!

To: Valuepro who wrote (268798)	8/13/2010 1:25:49 AM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 306849

You don't understand VP. When an R is Pres, then it's his fault. When a D is Pres is the fault of the R's in congress...even if they are a minority. U squared away now? -g-