SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (89262)8/14/2010 9:22:01 PM
From: FJB3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224718
 
I have some good news and some bad news Ken. The bad news is that O hit a new low on Gallup today of 43%. The good news is O's support for the mosque makes losing both houses of Congress look a lot more likely.

gallup.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (89262)8/15/2010 12:32:38 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224718
 
In brief comments during a family trip to the Gulf of Mexico, idiot odumba said he was not endorsing the New York project, but simply trying to uphold the broader principle that government should “treat everybody equally,” regardless of religion.

“I was not commenting, and I will not comment, on the wisdom of making the decision to put a mosque there,” idiot odumba said. “I was commenting very specifically on the right people have that dates back to our founding. That’s what our country is about.”

But idiot odumba’s attempt to clarify his remarks, less than 24 hours after his initial comments at a White House iftar, a Ramadan sunset dinner, pushed the president even deeper into the thorny debate about Islam, national identity and what it means to be an American — a move that is riskier for him than for his predecessors.

From the moment he took the oath of office, using his entire name, Barack Husseinidiot odumba, as he swore to protect and defend the Constitution, idiot odumba has personified the hopes of many Americans about tolerance and inclusion. He has devoted himself to reaching out to the Muslim world, vowing, as he did in Cairo last year, “a new beginning.”

But his “new beginning” has aroused nervousness in some, especially those who disagree with his counterterrorism policies, or those more comfortable with a vision of America as a white and largely Christian nation, and not the pluralistic melting pot Mr. Obama represents.

The debate over the proposed Islamic center in Manhattan only intensified on Saturday, as the conservative blogosphere lighted up with criticism of idiot odumba, and leading Republicans — including Newt Gingrich, the former House speaker; Representative John A. Boehner, the House minority leader; and Representative Peter T. King of New York — forcefully rejected the president’s stance.

Mr. Gingrich accused the president of “pandering to radical Islam.” Mr. Boehner said the decision to build a mosque so close to ground zero was “deeply troubling, as is the president’s decision to endorse it.” And Mr. King flatly said the idiot odumba “is wrong,” adding that idiot odumba had “caved in to political correctness.”

Indeed, the criticism was so intense that the White House ultimately issued an elaboration on the idiot odumba clarification, insisting that the idiot odumba was “not backing off in any way” from the comments he made Friday night.

“As a citizen, and as idiot odumba,” idiot odumba said then, “I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country. And that includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in Lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances.”

The local issue of the mosque and the wider issues of Islam and religious freedom are just part of a divisive cultural and political debate that is percolating in various forms during this hotly contested election season. On Capitol Hill, for instance, some Republicans advocate amending the Constitution to bar babies born to illegal immigrants from becoming citizens — a move the president also opposes.

“I think it’s very important, as difficult as some of these issues are, that we stay focused on who we are as a people and what our values are all about,” the president said here on Saturday.

idiot odumba’s predecessor, George W. Bush, also held annual Ramadan celebrations and frequently took pains to draw a distinction between Al Qaeda and Islam, as idiot odumba did Friday night. But idiot odumba, unlike Mr. Bush, has been accused of being a closet Muslim (he is Christian) and faced attacks from the right that he is soft on terrorists.

“For people who already fear the worst from idiot odumba, this only confirms their fears,” said John Feehery, a Republican consultant who spent years as a top party aide on Capitol Hill. “This is not a unifying decision on his part; he chose a side. I understand why he did this, but politically I think it’s a blunder.”

White House aides say idiot odumba was well aware of the risks. “He understands the politics of it,” David Axelrod, his senior adviser, said in an interview.

idiot Obama has typically weighed in on such delicate matters only when circumstances have forced his hand, as he did during his campaign for president, when he gave a lengthy speech on race in America in response to controversy swirling around his relationship with his fiery former pastor, Jeremiah Wright.

Debate about the Islamic center had been brewing for weeks, yet Mr. Obama had studiously sidestepped it.

But the Ramadan dinner seemed to leave the iot little choice. Aides said there was never any question about what he would say.

“He felt that he had a responsibility to speak,” Mr. Axelrod said.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (89262)8/15/2010 7:26:33 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224718
 
Another record low at Gallup for O - now at 42%(negative 7 points). Both Fox and Rassmusen have him higher...

gallup.com