Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (581034)	8/14/2010 7:27:13 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1578544

"Right. Blame it on Bush, not his incompetent successor who could have changed the policy and has chosen to stick with the same policy Bush was employing." It isn't the same policy. For one, they are actually trying to stabilize the country. Unlike Bush who was distracted by Iraq. Granted, I don't know if they still have the same policies that resulted in the Taliban getting about a third of the contracts in Afghanistan and are still paying the Taliban per truck for "insurance". I would hope not, but... "In case you haven't noticed, the incompetent bastard has been in the WH approaching two years. " And a lot of changes have been made. But, the years of mis-management may mean that it just isn't possible to stabilize things. "You can't keep blaming Bush for everything into perpetuity" You still blame Carter. And LBJ. And FDR. And 2 of the 3 have been dead for decades. But, I suppose since they were Democrats, it is ok... "While I know YOU will never admit you made a mistake" Bullshit. There you go with your projection shit again. I have admitted to mistakes when I make them. You, OTOH, would rather die than do that. Even when you have been proven wrong, with multiple sources, you either keep arguing or clam up, only to trot the same nonsense out later.