SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DebtBomb who wrote (269232)8/15/2010 1:35:52 PM
From: yard_manRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
I am not about to defend Bush -- but you've got to be realistic -- there is plenty of blame to go around for the coming depression. The roots reach all the way back to the bailout of the S&Ls.

Every president since then has abrogated their responsibility to put us on an even footing.

The only one I can't fault outright for this is Clinton -- but Clinton had the benefit of the wind at his back -- his point in the cycle was such that he couldn't do too much to screw things up too badly. To be sure, he proved to be more of a centrist and didn't do a ton of harmful things -- but had he been president now -- or had Hillary -- they'd have done things to exacerbate our current problems, too.

Thing is: Obama has enacted all the wrong policies at the wrong time -- he has never quit campaigning -- he continues to approach everything as if it were a continuation of the campaign -- he always says a bunch of really nice-sounding stuff.

But to Obama, government is the solution -- he doesn't even need to know the question. I have a friend who is practically an O groupie -- he simply loves the man. This friend has a great concern for the poor. I know I'll never get anywhere with him -- but the people who stand the most to lose from these "compassionate" policies are the very supposed objects of concern -- the people at the bottom. For instance, O demonized the insurance cos -- but who stands to benefit the most by this carp of forcing everyone to buy insurance -- similarly, he (and Bush) gave massive bailouts to AIG, auto companies, and other banksters -- but now has put together a bill that is going to prevent TBTF from happening again?? WTF -- Hypocrisy that is so thin everyone can see right through it -- this bill from Frank-Dodd was written by the guys that were partly responsible for it all running amok in the first place??

You need to recognize the government game -- whether it was Bush -- who made the Islamic fundamentalist threat so large and dangerous [I won't say there is no threat] that we needed to do away with common civil rights ets -- or whether it is Obama saying the inability of sick people to get insurance -- so we have to have government dictate EVERYONES insurance contracts -- or whatever -- the game is always the same: Some problem is so dire, the emergency is so great -- more government, not less -- is the only resort -- please, don't mention how government regulation created any perverse incentives that raised costs or dangers in the first place -- that's irrelevant.

What's the latest boogie-man -- how about deflation? That dangerous beast that will kill us all -- plunge us into a morass we'll never escape from??!! IS IT TRUE??

mises.org

I still believe there are lots of reasons to be hopeful as we enter the depression -- there is hope because when policy fails -- a large number may have an opportunity to choose freedom. This was a nice article -- I just don't believe it would have been the end without the bailouts -- we'll never know how quickly the economy would have healed w/o the government thefts?

minyanville.com

Three times we've had opportunities to let the markets clear and quit stupid government intervention: 1998, 2001 and 2008. I think soon people will wise up. Contrary to what you read -- the American people are NOT all sheep. Some are slower than others at putting it together. But I see a lot more who are starting to think through the longer term consequences of government intervention in the economy.