Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (378316)	8/15/2010 10:37:58 AM
From: Murrey Walker	1 Recommendation Respond to of 793750

I suspect some high-ranking Dems are going to have a chat with him. Maybe, but I suspect they realize their efforts will fall upon deaf ears, and are already caucusing on their new candidate for 2012.

To: carranza2 who wrote (378316)	8/15/2010 11:06:50 AM
From: skinowski	7 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793750

there will be no US attack on Iran's nukes, but there will be one by Israel I have a feeling that the entire world is holding its breath and waiting and hoping that Israel attacks -- so that everyone will be able to mouth off some crap about their excessive use of force or something like that, and the problem will be solved, and everyone will be able to return to business as usual. The problem is that an Israeli attack against Iran may be very costly - it may necessitate the use of unconventional weapons, which is an enormously important taboo - and may invite, sooner or later, a retaliation in kind. I would not be shocked if Israel at this time gives everyone a big FU - and settles for a MAD balance with Iran. Could be that this is the greatest fear of the nonproliferation enforcers - who know that they are paper tigers and do not have the balls to do their job.