Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (25023)	11/8/1997 9:58:00 PM
From: Matt C. Austin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

You're preaching to the choir here, Larry. He knows everything there is to know about shorting. He's just trying to confuse the issue - one more time.

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (25023)	11/8/1997 10:44:00 PM
From: Bear Down	Respond to of 35569

First of all Larry, I would like to compliment you on your recently obtained proffesionalism in answering my posts. I appreciate your politeness. You ask <Michael: How is it you have any of your lawsuit money left?>> cause I got a $__tload. ;-) Sure wish I could have back what I blew on KRT (If I listen to Buddy, Iwill) One day!!!! You are also correct I ain't no pro, but better at it than going long so I think I will continue to learn... Lastly, You say the shorts are running for cover. What price is it you think they sold at? It seems to me that if they sold anywhere near the Highs there is plenty of room for cover. I can't believe that they would trash this company for a few more nickels and dimes, there is plenty of stock available. Also notice that the declared short position is rising every month, this means they are still selling. I know it is only my opinion but I don't really think anybody is running for cover. And as far as Matt Austin is concerned, he is either very juvenile or acting that way in his attempts to look like a longie. "the wolf in sheep's clothing" with no e-mail address. I could be totally wong, afterall I am not a psycologist, but I am a realist and this is real suspicious behavior and resembles the behavior of the "true insiders" posting on Bre-X before its demise......And they were looking to sell not buy. Remember the easiest way to sell something is to talk so good about it that someone wants to buy it. Ever hear a used car salesman tell you about the lemon you are about to buy. Didn't think so