SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (22728)8/17/2010 12:10:36 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86356
 
No I don't present a rate scenario. Cab medallions are very valuable in multiple major cities. Particularly in New York, which has more people than a number of states, around 2 and a half percent of our population, and a noticeably (but not easily quantified) higher percentage of demand for cabs. This isn't some small weird town in the boondocks, its one of the largest cities in the world, and not the only city in the US where the right to run a cab is tightly restricted primarily to reduce competition. In other cities that right is also valuable, and the point isn't its value (that's just a side not to show how restricted it is in some cities), but the restriction, which costs our economy money and makes transport within cities (esp. in the poorer areas of cities) more problematic. That's not some rare scenario, it effects millions of people.

The license requirement for flower arranging is in only one state (LA), and in a less important industry, so its not as large of issue, but it (and things like requirements of interior decorators to have licenses, and other areas where there may be a bit more justification for the idea of licenses, but where the number is artificially kept low to help out a special interest), add up to a major restraint of trade. And that's just one minor area of law. Something like 70,000 pages of new federal regulations get published each year. Its not just that an intelligent educated normal person can't easily know what's legal or not, even a lawyer wouldn't know unless he was a specialist in a particular narrow area that is being considered, and perhaps not even then. The department of justice was asked how many federal offenses are on the books, and it couldn't answer. Our tax code is such a monstrosity even the IRS doesn't fully understand it. The IRS help line has been tested and it gives out different answers to the same tax questions. Its gotten to the point that ignorance of the law is a reasonable excuse (although not generally one that will hold up in court) because the law is understandable. All of this isn't rare scenarios, its an important reality for the country and its getting worse.