Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MJ who wrote (89400)	8/17/2010 9:26:28 PM
From: lorne	1 Recommendation Respond to of 224748

MJ...After hussein obama showing Americans his unwavering support for islam in the USA over Ground Zero wonder how Americans will react to hussein obama submitting to a meeting with ama din a jad? Wonder if he will bow to Iran's moslum dictator. Obama-Ahmadinejad summit in works? 3rd party military action could determine whether it's a go Posted: August 16, 2010 © 2010 WorldNetDaily wnd.com National Security Adviser Gen. James Jones' recent statement that President Obama would be prepared to meet with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad if Tehran resumes negotiations over its nuclear enrichment program has fueled speculation that such a meeting could occur late next year just as the U.S. presidential campaign season is to begin, according to a report from Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin. One Middle East source even suggested the meeting could occur in Tehran. In early August during a meeting of the United National General Assembly in New York, Ahmadinejad proposed face-to-face talks with Obama, but the White House reportedly declined. A possible summit between Obama and Ahmadinejad brings to mind the February 1972 meeting in China between President Richard Nixon and Chinese Communist Party Leader Mao Tse-Tung, and the top secret briefing that then-National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger gave to China's Zhou Enlai on the extent that Soviet military forces were positioned against China. The 1972 meeting led to understandings on such sensitive issues as Taiwan and paved the way to normalizing diplomatic relations between Washington and Beijing. While a meeting with Ahmadinejad would score a major victory for Obama's emphasis of diplomacy over military action, other sources contacted for the G2Bulletin believe such a development "is unlikely." Through a spokesman, Middle East expert Alastair Crooke, who has close contacts with the leadership in Iran and Syria, said that he has heard "nothing to suggest anything of the sort is imminent but (my) experience suggests that it is unlikely."

To: MJ who wrote (89400)	8/18/2010 5:29:03 AM
From: John Carragher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224748

several years back i was trying to get onto a major route. state trooper told me the ramps were closed all along the route. this was two hours before Bush even landed. He told me it was instructions from Washington for security reasons. We have gone to extremes imo to protect our president. Like someone else mentioned, why isn't he taking a helo to a location 15 miles away from the airport. I expect they would want multiple helos and perhaps it is more difficult to protect. a few more LA examples and nyc shut downs for him to go to a show will make white house rethink security. People will get so pissed off they will vote for someone else.