SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bear Down who wrote (25039)11/8/1997 11:11:00 PM
From: Furry Otter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
You think you sound like a big man when you threaten other people with firearms, but you are also guilty of making terroristic threats, a felony in certain states (including mine). Keep it up and getting kicked off SI will the least of your problems.

Otter



To: Bear Down who wrote (25039)11/8/1997 11:15:00 PM
From: Matt C. Austin  Respond to of 35569
 
David, Yop're a phony and everybody on this thread sees right thru you. You only post in a negative manner in all your posts. The short play in this stock is just about over. You'll be further ahead to move down the street until the govt' comes after you.

Your earlier post is typical of your life. I gave you some damn good advice and you respond with threats. Give it up.



To: Bear Down who wrote (25039)11/8/1997 11:17:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Respond to of 35569
 
Michael, be careful with the laudation, I am not exactly comsidered a bull here. I am one of those that say, maybe there is gold in those sand thars after all (I have personally measured some of the yellow stuff at a non IPMCF deposit), but maybe it ain't enough to get out and make money in the process. I am not concerned with the COC, I am concerned with the future bottom line, and red is not one of my favorite colors. Your laudation will put you squarely in the naysayers camp, dangerous on these shores. (VBG).

Zeev



To: Bear Down who wrote (25039)11/9/1997 8:51:00 AM
From: Keith Utz  Respond to of 35569
 
Michael, while I disagree with your views on IPM I'm sorry that you received threatening E-Mails. There's no excuse for that regardless of which side of the debate(??) we are on.

Keith