To: E_K_S who wrote (38929 ) 8/23/2010 8:08:17 PM From: Paul Senior Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78670 Been in ERF for several years ('06-'09 buys). One of my biggest losers currently. Is what happens more times than I like when I reach way up for yield and the distribution subsequently gets cut. I continue to hold, will follow you now though with a bit more in after-hours today. I like ERF's positioning itself in the unconventional shales, esp. for oil. Aside: Holding ERF currently in an ira, so not able to get the foreign tax credit. (It amounts to about 15% of the distribution.) Have made new buy now in a taxable account. (Just to get the tax credit, although it seems useless to me now, because I've already got more credits than I can use for taxes on "offsettable" income. Hence these credits just get carried over.) =========================== I don't like the Marcellus, and I try to avoid companies that are concentrated there. Marcellus is primarily gas; gas prices are in a downtrend. (It's a seasonal effect "they say".) To me, there's a glut or will be with all these unconventional drilling operations. I'd read in past that when glut happens, the companies aren't profitable or profitable enough, and so they stop drilling. Otoh, I've also read recently that some of these newer leases are held with the contractual requirement that drilling must proceed within a certain time or the drilling rights revert back to the land owner. Canada or maybe it's just one of the provinces, has a policy (or so I read again) that they give some land to drillers with the proviso that the drillers will drill, and then they get to keep the drilling rights. And if they don't drill and produce gas (or oil), the land leases revert back to the gov't. So this gives the drillers an incentive to drill even at unprofitable prices so that they can continue to control desirable acreage that will be valuable if/when gas prices increase.