Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apps for Apple iOS and OSX devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lahcim Leinad who wrote (186)	8/24/2010 7:15:16 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 848

Not classic, too many shoulders. The thing about H&S formations is that they look like H&S until they don't. Then people say well that wasn't an H&S. Sort of like ghosts, a great explanation until proven otherwise. Not saying everything isn't going to crap... Sure looks that way. But I like data not charts. Just me....

To: Lahcim Leinad who wrote (186)	8/26/2010 3:01:12 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 848

All I see is range...range...and more range... When a range runs for a meaningful length of time, it will always, by definition, be possible to find a pattern that is arguably a H&S (and also inverse H&S) at some timescale. But IMO the salient feature is that it's a trading range.