Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: axial who wrote (35242)	8/27/2010 1:49:59 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46821

[Rebuff] A Challenge to Bill Gates on Energy Research Andrew C. Revkin \| NY Times \| Aug 26, 2010 Richard Rosen, a senior fellow at the Tellus Institute in Boston, which charts scenarios for human development in this century, took issue with some of the points made by Bill Gates in the Technology Review interview explored here earlier this week. [cf.: #msg-26776446] I’ve posted Rosen’s note below, then some questions I sent back to him in response, and his reply. I’m sending this exchange to a number of other people working on the question of how to propel an energy quest that fosters human progress without overheating the planet — from Marty Hoffert to Joe Romm — and will follow up as further reactions come in. Here’s Rosen: "I noted with interest your article yesterday about the Bill Gates interview. Unfortunately, you may have given his views too much credibility, though, clearly, he is a very smart guy. But, perhaps, he doesn’t know that much about the physics of energy technology. "I agree with Gates that too many environmentalists, and others, say that solving the world’s greenhouse gas emissions problems will be “easy,” as he put it. He claims that such a view will lead to a lack of funding for energy technology R&D, and, therefore, to a lack of new technologies that will provide renewable or carbon-free energy cheaply. "I’m afraid that Gates, and many economists, are far too optimistic that R&D can help the world solve the climate problem cheaply. It is not going to be cheap, and people (and politicians, especially) have got to get used to that idea. For example, you quote Gates as hoping that new clean energy technologies could be invested that would provide electricity at a fraction of the cost of current coal fired electricity. But that is extremely unlikely. Engineers and scientists have been researching new electric generation and storage technologies (such as batteries) for over 125 years now." Cont.: dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com ------

To: axial who wrote (35242)	8/30/2010 11:48:48 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 46821

How to Speed Up Energy Innovation - A Q&A with Rebecca Henderson By Julia Hanna \| HBS Working Knowledge \| August 9, 2010 "I believe energy is the problem of our time." Is there a special sauce for stimulating innovation in the energy sector, a concoction to spur cost-effective developments toward solving the climate change problem? HBS professor Rebecca Henderson doesn't claim to know all the ingredients for that special sauce. But as someone who has spent a career studying technological change, Henderson has observed trends and common traits across a variety of industries. And her message is optimistic. Moving to clean energy "is not hopeless at all. We've hardly started to invest in energy innovation." In a forthcoming book to be published by the National Bureau of Economic Research in association with the University of Chicago Press, Accelerating Innovation in Energy: Insights from Multiple Sectors, Henderson and coauthor Richard G. Newell explore the histories of innovation in four sectors of the U.S. economy that have experienced enormous change and growth: agriculture, chemicals, life sciences, and information technology. By examining the intersecting roles played by the federal government, public policy, and the private sector to encourage innovation in these industries, the authors establish a clearer pathway to what it will take to drive the magnitude of change needed in the field of energy. Q&A: hbswk.hbs.edu ------