Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (582681)	8/25/2010 8:29:47 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573708

How about the 3 million government employees in our military? We could fire 90% and be no more at risk.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (582681)	8/26/2010 9:15:25 AM
From: Bill	1 Recommendation Respond to of 1573708

Yes, some of it (probably less the half) is a necessary drain on the economy.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (582681)	8/26/2010 1:03:56 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573708

Bill, > No matter how you slice it, public sector jobs are a long term drain on the economy. Some of that is necessary, of course. Roads, law enforcement, schools, etc. Law enforcement maybe (also national defense, the court system, etc.), but not schools. There isn't any good reason why schools should have to be run by governments (if your concern is the poor wouldn't be able to afford schooling, 1 - you might be surprised, 2 - charitable scholarships could be created, and 3 - you can have the government pay for it if you want without having the government actually do it, that's still a big government role, but it doesn't require anywhere near the current level of federal employees, esp. if you do it through some sort of voucher system with the parents and the students and the markets deciding, rather than having some bureaucratic funding mechanism). Roads are in between, more private roads and road building would in my opinion be reasonable, but I don't see any way to make it anywhere near a universal thing. Private courts can be (and often are) built by developers as part of building a new development, high traffic limited access roads can be toll roads, but I can't see the profit motive to build any other type of road. And the scope for changing from the "government runs it", to "government pays for it" change I mentioned for education is limited because the roads are already mostly built by private sector contractors for government money. We could privatize more existing toll roads, but many type of roads would be rather difficult to privatize.