SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (13996)11/10/1997 9:50:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 24154
 
Defying a Juggernaut, Netscape Looks For Place in Microsoft's World nytimes.com

This is a big article, it was the lead in the Times' business section today. Worth reading, definitely not a cheerleading article. Mostly it talks about Barksdale.

Barksdale, of course, is also an intense, relentless competitor. To
his rivals at Microsoft, the clearest evidence of Barksdale's no-holds-barred approach is Netscape's legal strategy. He constantly tells his workers that the company must rely only on its success in the marketplace, but Barksdale has prodded Washington to take antitrust action against Microsoft.

The Netscape campaign, according to Nathan Myhrvold, chief technology officer of Microsoft, resembles a "Nixon-era dirty tricks team."

"Don't believe this notion that Barksdale is some gracious Southern gentleman," Myhrvold added. "That's nonsense."


Boo hoo, Nathan. Such a dirty trick, expecting Microsoft to respect the law.

Oops, Gentleman Jim beat me to the punch. Next line:

Barksdale understandably takes a different view of his company's antitrust appeals. "Microsoft is a great company," he said, "and it would be even better if it did it legally."

Interesting aside:

With Barksdale known to be leaving, Netscape was not the only company interested in him. In the summer of 1994, Barksdale says he was approached twice about becoming the president and chief operating officer of Microsoft.

But being a high-level underling at Microsoft, he recalled, did not appeal to him. "Why walk into that snake pit," he said. "I'd be surrounded by three wizards who had done everything and who couldn't be told anything. And I wouldn't be captain of my own ship." He was referring to Bill Gates, chairman of Microsoft; Steven A. Ballmer, executive vice president, and Nathan Myhrvold, chief technology officer.


And one more, for the road:

The more serious proposal came in the summer of 1995, Barksdale says, when during a meeting with Microsoft executives at Netscape's offices, one Microsoft executive pulled Barksdale aside in a hallway and said Gates wanted to buy a stake of more than 15 percent in Netscape. In return for its cash, Microsoft wanted a board seat and rights to license Netscape technology. As a start-up company about to go public, Barksdale was told, Netscape could benefit enormously from "the Bill effect," the endorsement of Gates.

After weighing the offer, Netscape rejected Microsoft's embrace. "It could have been a quick start," Barksdale said. "But I felt that allowing Microsoft on the board was letting the fox in the henhouse."


And after some similar, less diplomatic assessments by other Netscape insiders, quite realistic given everything we know about Microsoft, we get the final word from the brilliant Nathan:

"Fool that I was, I was quite optimistic that we could do something together," said Myhrvold, the chief technology officer. "But there were people inside Microsoft who thought Barksdale was taking advantage of me, just trying to gain knowledge of our Internet plans."

Right Nathan, Microsoft's Internet plans were always so sophisticated and tricky. Kill Netscape, real subtle one there. Give away software, leverage the OS monopoly as much as possible. Maybe if Bill had shipped Jim Redmond water to drink for about 2 years before making an offer, he would have understood Microsoft better.

Cheers, Dan.