SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Roger's 1997 Short Picks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Markowski who wrote (6678)11/9/1997 1:39:00 PM
From: Pancho Villa  Respond to of 9285
 
Tom, thanks for the quick responce. 100% of what you said made sense to me. Conclusion: this potato is still to hot to handle. Will not put any heavy research effort/money on it at this time.

Regards,

Pancho

PS: I wish Roger well. (Which I guesss means that I hope you are not long)



To: Tom Markowski who wrote (6678)11/9/1997 2:09:00 PM
From: Roger A. Babb  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 9285
 
Tom, although I disagree with the long case for CTXS, thanks for a good post in support of CTXS. Although I am short, I do recognize that there are two sides to the debate on this one. CTXS Winframe will have to successfully compete with MSFT Hydra to support the current valuation and I don't think it will have any better luck than Stacker did in the same situation. You are betting that CTXS will beat MSFT in the marketplace. A big win if it happens, but unlikely in my opinion.

As for earnings, they DID go in the tank this past quarter, deduct the almost $10 million in MSFT "revenue recognition" from the $13 million and only $3 million are left for "on-going" business, a large decline from last quarter and not enough to support a $2 billion market cap. Even using the "revenue recognition" gimmick, growth can not continue without additional income from sales outside the MSFT deal. Note that cash assets are now in a down trend, there is a "burn rate" on the MSFT windfall.