Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (264502)	8/29/2010 11:54:09 PM
From: Mahmoud Mohammed	Respond to of 275872

Elmer, Re: "... Do you think Dirk was being honest when he made that claim or was he possibly misrepresenting the truth?" Nah ... It was probably just a "rumor" that Dirk had heard. <ggg> Mahmoud

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (264502)	8/29/2010 11:58:12 PM
From: Mahmoud Mohammed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Elmer, Re: "... that was when AMD promised gullible devotees they would have 32nm in mid 2010:" You're embarrassing Mr Jelly. <ggg> Mahmoud

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (264502)	9/2/2010 5:56:36 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

"This link to AMD's Financial Analysts' Day PDF of 11/11/09 shows Bulldozer in 2010." No it doesn't. Looks like 2011 on the slide. "Additionally, that was when AMD promised gullible devotees they would have 32nm in mid 2010:" Correct. We know that Llano has been delayed. As to Bulldozer, from your link... AMD did not confirm or deny any schedules for the Bulldozer processors. "Again, a claim of production ramp in mid 2010. Do you think Dirk was being honest when he made that claim or was he possibly misrepresenting the truth?" False choice. Those are the only possibilities. Besides, it was clear he wasn't talking about Bulldozer, but Llano. You have resorted to your old tricks of hand-waving, conflating different issues and making wild claims.