SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (23073)8/31/2010 3:40:40 PM
From: Eric1 Recommendation  Respond to of 86355
 
Bahamas Bans Offshore Drilling

The Public is advised that The Ministry of The Environment has suspended consideration of all applications for oil exploration and drilling in the waters of The Bahamas. The Ministry seeks, by this decision, to maintain and safeguard an unpolluted marine environment for The Bahamas, notwithstanding the potential financial benefits of oil explorations.

Additionally all existing licenses will be reviewed to ascertain any legal entitlement for renewal.

Given recent events involving oil exploration and the efforts to prevent pollution, this prudent safeguard is essential to preserving the most vital natural resource of The Bahamas, its environment.

The Ministry will work diligently to complete and have in place, very stringent and environmental protocols for oil exploration prior to any further consideration of applications, given that oil is likely to be located in the marine environment of The Bahamas.

The Ministry of The Environment believes that this prudent policy requirement is in the best interest of The Bahamas and the social, economic and environmental wellbeing of future generations of Bahamian citizens and visitors.

rigzone.com



To: Road Walker who wrote (23073)8/31/2010 3:47:01 PM
From: Eric1 Recommendation  Respond to of 86355
 
Blowin' in the Wind
by Lindsay Riddell Aug 31 2010

San Francisco's Pattern Energy thinks that wind power will be part of the future of energy for the southern United States.

Pattern Energy wants to do what T. Boone Pickens couldn’t: deliver Texas’ overabundance of wind power to less-windy states.

The wind and transmission line developer aims to build a $1 billion, 400-mile transmission line to carry electricity generated by Texas wind turbines to Mississippi where it could be distributed across existing lines to Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, and other states in the South.

Texas generates far more wind power than it can use, and it’s building a series of lines to deliver that power from rural areas where it’s produced to substations. Pattern would tap into electric stations near the Texas-Louisiana border.

“What it does is allows a new leg to be built that allows some of that power to be flowing into the South, where there aren’t as many renewable-energy opportunities,” said Pattern CEO Mike Garland.

Pattern hopes the line will attain permits within two years and estimates it will take three years to build after that.

Scott Henry, CEO of SERC Reliability Corp., which enforces standards and regulations of transmission in the territory Pattern wants to connect to Texas, said there is precedent for interconnecting transmission territories, and Congress has made rules and offered incentives to encourage those connections to safeguard the electric grid and allow for more renewable-energy development.

“The 400 miles of transmission line is obviously a very long line, and there are typical challenges that one might face with that type of project,” Henry said, noting he had not seen Pattern’s proposal. “While certainly not impossible, it would be a challenging task.”

A major challenge, said Pattern executive David Parquet, is getting utilities to buy the power. Pattern has to prove to utilities serving the Southeast, including Entergy, Tennessee Valley Authority, and Southern Co., that it can deliver power at a price that can compete with nonrenewable sources even when factoring in the cost of the new transmission line. Securing contracts with utilities is crucial to securing the funding to build the transmission line.

Congress is considering a national renewable portfolio standard—RPS—that would mandate utilities obtain a certain percentage of electricity from renewable sources. Many states already enforce some renewable mandates.

A national standard would drive utilities to seek sources like the wind power Pattern will provide, but Pattern said the company’s proposition is compelling even without the standard.

“We’d obviously like to have an RPS, but we’re really excited about the economics of high capacity factor wind and particularly connecting to the transmission already built,” Parquet said.

portfolio.com



To: Road Walker who wrote (23073)8/31/2010 4:02:22 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 86355
 
Judge in Virginia ‘Global Warming’ Investigation Blocks Inquiry Into…His Wife’s Former Employer
by Christopher C. Horner

As you can read here, retired Albemarle County (Virginia) Circuit Judge Paul Peatross has ruled that Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli may not have access to records under Virginia’s Fraud Against Taxpayers Act, as he seeks to determine the propriety of Michael “Hockey Stick” Mann’s claims made to obtain research funding. Judge Peatross’s ruling protects Mann, the University, and specifically the Department of Environmental Sciences, at least for now.

UVA_02

Here’s the rub, on which I will have more to say. I attended the hearing a week ago Friday at which the parties argued the University’s motion to dismiss. The Deputy AG Wesley Russell’s arguments dominated, so badly I almost felt sorry for the University. The judge’s queries were puzzling, as he pleaded with the University’s counsel to come up with some argument how he might rule in their favor, as were other comments (continue reading).

Before the hearing commenced Peatross, substituting for the vacationing chief judge, cited his wife’s 1982 degree in environmental science from UVA – oddly, he then said “but not in global warming” — as part of a rather spare recitation of why he was hearing of this case (which he attested he had never heard about until reading the briefs that morning. A prominent case in the local, state and national news assigned to his old court! This man takes his retirement seriously…), and articulating his history so that counsel might decide whether he carried any conflict such that he should not hear the University’s motion.

That fact of her 1982 degree from Mann’s former Department, apparently, was relevant. Okay. But…

The fact that the judge’s wife had in fact previously worked in that Department of Environmental Sciences — the very Department that stands to suffer should he have ruled in favor of the Attorney General – was somehow not worth disclosing to counsel.

I only learned of this after the hearing by others who had also worked at the same time Ms. Peatross did, in messages expressing astonishment that her husband would decide such a matter given the obvious appearance of an inability to objectively hear it.

Also not worth disclosing was that Ms. Peatross’s relationships go much deeper, being, e.g., lauded for her role in producing a book edited by the Department’s then-chairman during Mann’s alleged hijinks, as well as, it appears, at least two of his papers.

But that she has a degree from the Department in 1982 merited consideration in determining the judge’s suitability to hear the case. And only that.

Amazing.

Now, to be completely accurate, it is an open question whether Ms. Peatross worked for the Department of Environmental Sciences, or simply in the building, physically (which I am told with no doubts that she did), for one of two particular former colleagues of Mann’s (and one supervisor at the relevant times) in their consultancies. The latter response, if it were the case, would beg other questions about mixing research and consulting. Which is to say, there is no good answer to the question. Which may be why the University refused to answer it when I asked. Four times. The two former colleagues of Mann for whom Ms. Peatross worked, according to a very basic Google search, also declined my invitation to clarify.

Charlottsville (I live here) is indeed the epitome of a company town – with UVA the company – as is surrounding Albemarle County. An adverse ruling leading to release of Mann’s relevant documents was the biggest possible black eye for a university that zealously promotes its prestige derived, in part, from Thomas Jefferson having founded it…a history the school’s lawyers rather sadly invoked up front in their brief arguing that, while some people are subject to laws, others simply cannot suffer the indiginity (if you’re thinking “Hollywood and Roman Polanski”, I’m way ahead of you). Well, of course. It’s on Jefferson’s headstone up on the hill, no doubt.

But while that particular argument of “academic freedom” did not prevail, the University did nonetheless manage to persuade Judge Peatross to block the taxpayer from discovering whether the University’s employee, Mann, engaged in fraud on the taxpayer. Again, this is for now as, according to press reports, Mr. Cuccinelli intends to press on with a new civil investigative demand (CID). It was not a complete victory for the University but, if you attended argument and/or read the briefs, you know such an outcome was not a consideration.

However that turns out, this series of events at best provides a very uncomfortable appearance of failure to disclose. Indeed, it seems to clearly rise to the level of a basis for the judge to recuse himself, instead of asking counsel, in his presence, whether they thought he was possibly biased.

The last thing our institutions of government need right now is more reason to question their operation. This is unfortunate and could easily have been avoided. Having read Cuccinelli’s briefs and seen his Deputy argue rings around the school and its hapless case for hiding the truth, I feel the truth will inevitably out, if later and after more wrangling than was necessary.

biggovernment.com



To: Road Walker who wrote (23073)8/31/2010 5:05:15 PM
From: Eric1 Recommendation  Respond to of 86355
 
EV Batteries Plummet in Price: Down To $400 a kwH

Better Place talks finance. IBM shoots for Lithium Air prototypes in two years.

San Francisco-- Lithium ion batteries might not decline in price as fast as computer processors or memory, but an unusual combination of circumstances is nonetheless allowing for torrid discounts at the moment.

Better Place, the company currently building car charging and battery swapping networks in Israel and Denmark, is currently purchasing batteries for cars at $400 a kilowatt hour for delivery in early 2012, according to company executives. Better Place and IBM held an informal dinner briefing with reporters last night in San Francisco. (IBM and Better Place? What are they doing together? That was a question everyone had on their minds.).

Compare that to October, 2007. Then, battery packs for EVs sold for around $1,000, according to Lawrence Seef, vice president of global alliances at Better Place. Thus, in a little under three years, the going price has declined by 60 percent. Earlier this year, Better Place's Jason Wolf said that EV batteries were approaching $500 a kilowatt hour.

That's good news for the EV business. The high price of batteries has been one of the major problems for the electric car industry. The Nissan Leaf, for instance, has a 24 kilowatt hour battery. If batteries cost $1000 a kilowatt hour, the battery alone would cost $24,000 and make it near impossible for Nissan to profitably sell the car for $32,800 before incentives. At $400 a kilowatt hour, the battery pack would only cost $9,600, according to multiplication conducted by Greentech Media.

Low prices, of course, are also good new for Better Place. Under its business plan, Better Place will own the batteries that power the cars on its network. Consumers will then pay the company a monthly fee for the batteries, electricity and any other ancillary services. Cheaper batteries thus will lower its capital and operating costs: the expense of owning all of those batteries has been one of the big question marks hanging over the fate of Better Place.

The prices are not likely plummeting strictly because of innovations with battery cells or packs. Lithium ion batteries have been in volume production since the early 90s and are a somewhat mature technology that progresses at a incremental rate. Many of these current gains likely come from higher production volumes, according to Dr. Wilfried Wilcke, senior manager, nanoscale science and technology at IBM. Manufacturers ramping up for volume production is not like chip makers turning the crank on Moore's Law: it is not guided by engineering principles and may not repeat itself. Hence, it is uncertain whether or how long the pricing trend will continue. The Department of Energy has set a goal of getting batteries for cars down to $250 a kilowatt hour.

Other interesting tidbits from the dinner:

--IBM hopes to have a 10 kilowatt hour prototype of a lithium air battery in about two years. Lithium air batteries will, ideally, hold far more energy than conventional lithium ion batteries, said Wilcke, and even more than zinc air and lithium sulfur batteries. Lithium air batteries may also be more amenable to recharging than zinc air batteries and cost far less than these other cells. Nonetheless, commercialization could take years.

"We have just left base camp," when it comes to lithium air batteries, he said. IBM last year described a membrane that it hopes to insert into lithium air batteries.

Lithium air batteries, Wilcke added, will be needed to mass produce EVs that can compete directly in terms of performance and range with gas-burning cars. Even with the recent price declines, "the steady state will not get us there," Wilcke said. In terms of energy density, lithium ion batteries are seven to eight times worse than gasoline. (Side note: a kilogram of lithium ion batteries has a density of 100 to 200 kilowatt hours, while kilograms of zinc air, lithium sulfur and lithium air have densities of, respectively, 400 kilowatt hours, 500 kilowatt hours and 1,700 kilowatt hours.)

--Seef said that it costs Better Place about $150,000 million to build a "cell", i.e. a network of charging and swapping stations complete with batteries to serve a major metropolitan network. Better Place only needs about 20,000 to 30,000 customers to break even. Put another way, that means Better Place needs to get $7,500 to $5,000 from each customer in a minimal situation over a four year period to break even. That means in a cell with 30,000 customers, Better Place needs to get $1,250 per customer per year. Doubling the number of users drops that to $625. Whether that's perilous or promising is up for you, my readers, to debate. There is more on Better Place's financial strategy here.

--Better Place will have two to three kinds of batteries in its network. Different batteries will help get around the worry that swappable batteries will lead to homogenization. Ford, Nissan, General Motors, Volkswagen and others have rejected battery swapping to date for, among other reasons, that swapping would detract from a car's distinct design and personality.

greentechmedia.com



To: Road Walker who wrote (23073)8/31/2010 5:42:19 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86355
 
How much did Soros pay him?



To: Road Walker who wrote (23073)9/3/2010 4:43:09 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 86355
 
A Lomborg About-Face on Warming?

Jonathan H. Adler • August 31, 2010 10:17 am

The Guardian reports on an “apparent U-turn” by Bjorn Lomborg, the “skeptical environmentalist,” on the issue of global climate change. (See also here.) The stories report that Lomborg has a new book, due out this fall, in which he calls global warming “one of the chief concerns facing the world today” and urges adoption of a carbon tax to finance $100 billion in R&D for climate-friendly technologies, and $50 billion in climate adaptation. Tyler Cowen notes the story with a post titled “Lomborg v. Lomborg,” and TNR’s Bradford Plumer calls Lomborg’s new position “a pretty striking about-face,” and suggests it may be a cynical ploy to sell books.

Yet Lomborg’s new position is not much of “U-turn,” striking or otherwise. Lomborg has acknowledged the reality of human-induced warming in all of his books, while discounting some of the more apocalyptic scenarios. In his 2007 book Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist’s Guide to Global Warming (which I reviewed here), he declared that climate change was a “problem” and recommended a strikingly similar response. Specifically, he called for the imposition of a carbon tax and urged a global commitment to financing climate-friendly R&D to the tune of $25 billion per year. His new proposal is more ambitious – a larger tax to fund even more research – but otherwise is much the same. So, too, is his overall message: Climate change is one of many problems the world faces, must compete with other priorities, and should be addressed in a cost-effective manner. Perhaps what’s really changed is not Lomborg’s perspective, but the degree to which commentators actually pay attention to what he writes.
Categories: Climate Change, Environment

15 Comments

1. Frank G says:

I think you’re right — there’s nothing contradictory with being concerned about a general problem but skeptical about some of the details. That’s how any reasonable person would approach a complex issue.

...

volokh.com