Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (25112)	11/9/1997 6:33:00 PM
From: go4it	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Bill, An intelligent person doesn't need a sample of dirt to test in order to be long or short in IPM. All they have to do is ask themselves one question. Why is it that when ever people perform alot of due diligence they always come back as a long ? It seems obvious to me. I have not seen this first hand but I trust the people that have and I think that is what it all boils down to. I just can't believe that you aren't out there joining the Great Southwestern gold rush. or are you? Chuck

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (25112)	11/10/1997 12:13:00 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

There are three concepts to hang on to here. 1. Only special techniques can assay the desert deposits. 2. The deposits may in fact be too fine to recover by any economic techique. 3. It may be untrue. Many have claimed this before. Its an old story.