Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (583989)	9/2/2010 8:54:08 AM
From: jlallen	7 Recommendations Respond to of 1572777

Nonsense of course. Bush attempts to rein in Fannie and Freddie who created the market for those "innovations" were rebuffed by the Dems.

To: bentway who wrote (583989)	9/2/2010 9:55:32 AM
From: i-node	4 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1572777

Two hundred million dollars a year for three years. I've got news for you, nitwit. This wasn't a $600 Million problem. $600 Million would have funded maybe 2500 mortgages. The effect wasn't so much as a blip. This problem began with Clinton in '96 revising the regulations that were put in place under Carter, such that bad loans HAD to be made, else they would not be entitled to certain "benefits" they needed in order to grow. Clinton. 100%. It was Clinton's idea to strengthen the requirement. It was Clinton's action that made it happen. Who knows whether Bush was even aware it happened, it seemed so insignificant at the time. That, coupled with Clinton's (Robt. Rubin's) refusal to allow regulation of derivatives, brought the house down. Literally.

To: bentway who wrote (583989)	9/13/2010 10:24:44 PM
From: FJB	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572777

The Democrats' Fannie Is Showing Posted 07:00 PM ET investors.com Irresponsibility: After the global financial crisis, no politician would dare chide another for too much "safety and soundness." But in 2004, 76 Democrats actually asked President Bush not to manage Fannie Mae responsibly. There are smoking guns and then there are smoking bazookas. The June 28, 2004, letter from Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and dozens of other House Democrats to President Bush, posted by Moe Lane on Redstate.com last week, forever squashes Democratic claims about the mortgage crisis not being their fault. "We urge you to reconsider your administration's criticisms of the housing-related government sponsored enterprises (the 'GSEs') and instead work with Congress to strengthen the mission and oversight of the GSEs," states the missive of nearly a page and a half, signed by a rogues' gallery of 76 House Democrats. They include not only Frank, current chairman of the House Banking Committee; but Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., now being probed for reportedly laundering TARP money in her husband's bank; and erstwhile House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., who is charged with more than a dozen counts of violating House rules and federal laws. Almost comically, the letter states that the Democrats are unhappy the Bush administration is "emphasizing only safety and soundness," claiming that "an exclusive focus on safety and soundness is likely to come, in practice, at the expense of affordable housing." And the Democratic representatives charged that "because Congress has not been willing to jeopardize the GSEs' mission, the administration has turned to attacking the GSEs publicly." Such attacks could mean "negative opinions in the financial markets regarding the GSEs, raising their cost of financing." It turned out, of course, that the negative opinions of Fannie Mae, and its evil twin Freddie Mac, in the financial markets were due to the GSEs taking a lead role in crippling the global economy. The GSEs used the taxpayer-funded financial power of the federal government to give ultralow rate mortgages to millions of Americans with rotten credit ratings — which ended up poisoning the portfolios of investors around the world. That Fannie and Freddie are disasters is, of course, today undeniable. Even Frank last month told Fox Business Network's Neil Cavuto regarding Fannie and Freddie, "I think they should be abolished." In an election year in which voters are sick of governmental largesse and Uncle Sam's mismanagement of everything, and in which even Frank's "safe" seat in Taxachusetts is endangered, Frank doesn't dare say anything less.